Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix bijectionist doctests #39791

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

PinotNoir04
Copy link

Fixes #36480

Fixed the bijectionist.py doctest that was failing on testing with

--optional=4ti2,antic,build,cbc,ccache,cryptominisat,debian,dot2tex,e_antic,external,fricas,glucose,kissat,latte_int,lidia,normaliz,pip,sage,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sage_spkg

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise and informative.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation and checked the documentation preview.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tscrim tscrim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is coming from an update to FindStat I believe. I can reproduce it as well. Let's wait for the bots, but if they come back green, then positive review.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 28, 2025

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 54518c2; changes) is ready! 🎉
This preview will update shortly after each push to this PR.

@PinotNoir04
Copy link
Author

PinotNoir04 commented Mar 28, 2025

/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.12/lib/python3.12/site-packages/cysignals/signals.cpython-312-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
This is the error message.
Is this a problem on my end?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

make doctests in bijectionist more robust
2 participants