-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: release v2.14.1 (#2866) @W-7258582 #2867
Conversation
* fix: only remove slot children in synthetic shadow * fix: use case block
…#2844) * test(integration-karma): ensure constructable stylesheets are re-used * test: add test for shared style
* docs: fix typo in template compiler readme * docs: rewording usage of lwc dynamic directive Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com>
…ode" (#2859) * fix(engine-core): correctly compute shadowMode * fix: fix comment * fix: update packages/integration-karma/test/mixed-shadow-mode/dual-component/index.spec.js Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> * fix: fix another one * fix: improve tests * fix: improve tests * fix: improve test * fix: revert * Revert "refactor(engine): optimize computation of transitive shadow mode (#2803)" This reverts commit 95ce4c3. Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com>
✅ All Pre-release Checks Passed
|
🚢 Release StartingThis pull request has been merged and the release of version 2.14.1 is starting. You can monitor the progress of the release in Nucleus by visiting the following URL. |
❌ An unexpected error occurred while attempting to start the |
/nucleus update-downstream-deps |
Updating downstream deps to depend on version 2.14.1 of salesforce/lwc |
❌ An unexpected error occurred while attempting to start the |
* fix: only remove slot children in synthetic shadow (#2843) * fix: only remove slot children in synthetic shadow * fix: use case block * fix: only add version mismatch test code in karma (#2852) * test(integration-karma): ensure constructable stylesheets are re-used (#2844) * test(integration-karma): ensure constructable stylesheets are re-used * test: add test for shared style * chore(nucleus): remove more downstreams (#2855) * chore(nucleus): remove another downstream (#2857) * docs: fix typo in template compiler readme (#2848) * docs: fix typo in template compiler readme * docs: rewording usage of lwc dynamic directive Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> * test(integration-karma): update ACT components (#2862) * fix(engine-core): revert "optimize computation of transitive shadow mode" (#2859) * fix(engine-core): correctly compute shadowMode * fix: fix comment * fix: update packages/integration-karma/test/mixed-shadow-mode/dual-component/index.spec.js Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> * fix: fix another one * fix: improve tests * fix: improve tests * fix: improve test * fix: revert * Revert "refactor(engine): optimize computation of transitive shadow mode (#2803)" This reverts commit 95ce4c3. Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> * chore: release v2.14.1 (#2866) * refactor(engine-core): encapsulate renderer as an object and allow it to be injectable in vnodes (#2763) * refactor(engine-core): passing the renderer from an import statement in compiled templates Co-authored-by: Ravi Jayaramappa <ravi.jayaramappa@salesforce.com> Co-authored-by: Pierre-Marie Dartus <p.dartus@salesforce.com> Co-authored-by: Nolan Lawson <nolan@nolanlawson.com> * test(integration-karma): more shadow transitivity tests (#2864) * chore: release v.2.14.2 @W-7258582 (#2871) * Revert "chore: release v2.14.1 (#2866) @W-7258582 (#2867)" This reverts commit 518ab2e. Co-authored-by: Nolan Lawson <nolan@nolanlawson.com> Co-authored-by: Mohan Raj Rajamanickam <1509984+mohanraj-r@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Eugene Kashida <ekashida@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ravi Jayaramappa <ravi.jayaramappa@salesforce.com> Co-authored-by: Caridy Patiño <caridy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Pierre-Marie Dartus <p.dartus@salesforce.com>
Details
Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?
Does this pull request introduce an observable change?
GUS work item