Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(ssr): remove filterProperties #5101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

perf(ssr): remove filterProperties #5101

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

nolanlawson
Copy link
Collaborator

@nolanlawson nolanlawson commented Jan 7, 2025

Details

This is another small perf improvement, on the order of 6-11%. The optimization here is to avoid creating an additional object via filterProperties and instead to do the filtering directly when setting properties on the component.

Screenshot 2025-01-06 at 4 02 34 PM

There are probably more optimizations that can be done here, but starting with this small change.

Does this pull request introduce a breaking change?

  • 😮‍💨 No, it does not introduce a breaking change.

Does this pull request introduce an observable change?

  • 🤞 No, it does not introduce an observable change.

@nolanlawson nolanlawson requested a review from a team as a code owner January 7, 2025 00:04
) {
(this as any)[propName] = props[propName];
}
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nolanlawson nolanlawson Jan 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of this is copypasta'd from filterProperties. Note this.#props doesn't really matter because we only ever check the class on it.

@nolanlawson nolanlawson merged commit 0b12680 into master Jan 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@nolanlawson nolanlawson deleted the nolan/perf-filter branch January 7, 2025 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants