Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config: restrict deployments to amd64 nodes #328

Merged

Conversation

synarete
Copy link
Collaborator

@synarete synarete commented Feb 13, 2024

Until samba-operator supports other architectures (namely, ARM64), restrict its deployment to AMD64 nodes (e.g., in cases of non x86_64 or mixed ARCH clusters) via standard K8s node-selector mechanism [1].

[1] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/

depends on #329

Copy link

dpulls bot commented Feb 13, 2024

🎉 All dependencies have been resolved !

Copy link
Collaborator

@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It might be nice to clarify that your patch is an adaptation of the original contribution. Something like adding a 'Original-Version-By:' footer?

Copy link
Collaborator

@obnoxxx obnoxxx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@synarete could you please add a Co-authored tag instead of your signoff to the commit message? I. E. Co-authored-by: Shachar Sharon <your email>

otherwise, this looks like a clean wrapping of PR #326

@obnoxxx
Copy link
Collaborator

obnoxxx commented Feb 13, 2024

@phlogistonjohn wrote.

It might be nice to clarify that your patch is an adaptation of the original contribution. Something like adding a 'Original-Version-By:' footer?

Not sure it is required because the original contributor @tiferrei of #326 is still t author of this PR's commit which also carries their signoff line

Until samba-operator supports other architectures (namely, ARM64),
restrict its deployment to AMD64 nodes (e.g., in cases of non x86_64 or
mixed ARCH clusters) via standard K8s node-selector mechanism [1].

[1] https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/scheduling-eviction/assign-pod-node/

Signed-off-by: Tiago Ferreira <me@tiferrei.com>
Co-authored-by: Shachar Sharon <ssharon@redhat.com>
@synarete
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@synarete could you please add a Co-authored tag instead of your signoff to the commit message? I. E. Co-authored-by: Shachar Sharon <your email>

otherwise, this looks like a clean wrapping of PR #326

ACK

Copy link
Collaborator

@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good enough for me.

@anoopcs9
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest centos-ci/sink-clustered/mini-k8s-latest

Copy link
Collaborator

@obnoxxx obnoxxx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adjusting the commit message, @synarete ! LGTM now!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 3af87a2 into samba-in-kubernetes:master Feb 14, 2024
13 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot added the priority-review This PR deserves a look label Feb 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority-review This PR deserves a look
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants