Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add a release process document #339

Merged

Conversation

phlogistonjohn
Copy link
Collaborator

This is based on the process followed to create the recent release and should serve as a guide in case someone else does a future release.

docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release-process.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn force-pushed the jjm-doc-rel-process branch 3 times, most recently from ff81382 to 67af9da Compare June 3, 2024 14:58
This is based on the process followed to create the recent release and
should serve as a guide in case someone else does a future release.

Signed-off-by: John Mulligan <jmulligan@redhat.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@obnoxxx obnoxxx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 425648e into samba-in-kubernetes:master Jun 4, 2024
13 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot added the priority-review This PR deserves a look label Jun 19, 2024
@phlogistonjohn phlogistonjohn deleted the jjm-doc-rel-process branch June 21, 2024 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority-review This PR deserves a look
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants