Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add_file_datastream should check for a reflection. Fixes #594 #595

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2014

Conversation

jcoyne
Copy link
Member

@jcoyne jcoyne commented Nov 13, 2014

No description provided.

@jcoyne
Copy link
Member Author

jcoyne commented Nov 13, 2014

@jeremyf Yeah, I knew that was a little opaque when I wrote it. Do you like this way better?

@jeremyf
Copy link
Contributor

jeremyf commented Nov 13, 2014

@jcoyne The second one is better in that the assignment is not hidden in an the second operand of the &&.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) when pulling daae58e on check_reflection into e2bbd24 on fedora-4.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) when pulling daae58e on check_reflection into e2bbd24 on fedora-4.

jeremyf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2014
add_file_datastream should check for a reflection. Fixes #594
@jeremyf jeremyf merged commit 5b7bc71 into fedora-4 Nov 13, 2014
@jeremyf jeremyf deleted the check_reflection branch November 13, 2014 19:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants