Makes has_key? and key? behave consistently in AF::AssociationHash
#932
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dchandekstark
force-pushed
the
908-association-hash-key
branch
from
0a319b5
to
555359d
Compare
Fixes samvera#908 Adds unit tests for AF::AssociationHash.
dchandekstark
force-pushed
the
908-association-hash-key
branch
from
555359d
to
a2aa6ad
Compare
|
Anyone expect me to "fix" the coveralls failure? @tpendragon @jcoyne @awead |
awead
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2015
Makes `has_key?` and `key?` behave consistently in AF::AssociationHash
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #908
Adds unit tests for AF::AssociationHash.