Expanding method interface #5941
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jeremyf
force-pushed
the
jf-expanding-method-interface
branch
from
7919bfa
to
f50dbe0
Compare
Prior to this commit, we had inconsistent method interfaces for the two IIIF presenters. Further, we also had the case where the `hostname` and `ability` were not "public", even though we had public writer methods. With this commit, we normalize that.
dlpierce
force-pushed
the
jf-expanding-method-interface
branch
from
f50dbe0
to
306e328
Compare
dlpierce
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prior to this commit, we had inconsistent method interfaces for the two IIIF presenters. Further, we also had the case where the
hostnameandabilitywere not "public", even though we had public writer methods.With this commit, we normalize that.