♻️ Favor using to_rdf_representation #6709
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We're more and more using the to_rdf_representation as the baseline conceptual class that we're persisting. It is different from generic_type in that in the case of Pcdm::Work, the `to_rdf_representation` represents the specific implemented work model and the generic_type remains `Work`.
jeremyf
force-pushed
the
favor-to-rdf-representation
branch
from
a27902c
to
1f4a632
Compare
dlpierce
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We're more and more using the to_rdf_representation as the baseline
conceptual class that we're persisting. It is different from
generic_type in that in the case of Pcdm::Work, the
to_rdf_representationrepresents the specific implemented work modeland the generic_type remains
Work.