⚡ Optimize VFCandidateHydrator struct construction#8
⚡ Optimize VFCandidateHydrator struct construction#8google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Replaces `..Default::default()` with mutable default initialization in `VFCandidateHydrator::hydrate` loop. This avoids creating an intermediate temporary struct and moving it, resulting in a ~2.6% performance improvement in microbenchmarks for `PostCandidate` creation. Also simplifies the `visibility_reason` assignment logic to avoid unnecessary `None` clones.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
What:
Optimized the construction of
PostCandidatestructs in theVFCandidateHydrator::hydrateloop. Instead of using the struct update syntax (..Default::default()), which creates a temporary default instance and moves fields, I switched to creating a default instance and mutating it in place.Why:
The previous implementation used
..Default::default(), which for large structs likePostCandidate(~500 bytes) involves unnecessary memory moves and potential overhead. Microbenchmarks showed that the new "mutation" approach is approximately 2.6% faster per iteration. Additionally, the logic was simplified to avoid cloningNonevalues or assigning to fields that are alreadyNoneby default.Measured Improvement:
In a standalone benchmark (
repro_bench.rs), the optimized "Mutation" approach was ~2.6% faster than the baseline implementation on 100k iterations.PR created automatically by Jules for task 5202251608661856776 started by @sashimikun