Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ordered Quality of Iterables ordered by a given Comparator, closes #157 #158

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2023

Conversation

dmfs
Copy link
Collaborator

@dmfs dmfs commented Dec 30, 2023

this should solve the use case of hamcrest/JavaHamcrest#404

@dmfs dmfs force-pushed the 157-orderedBy-quality branch from 0de1783 to f1ba192 Compare December 30, 2023 17:45
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 30, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (15c8981) 97.71% compared to head (4a2549e) 97.73%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #158      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     97.71%   97.73%   +0.01%     
- Complexity      821      823       +2     
============================================
  Files           213      214       +1     
  Lines          1793     1807      +14     
  Branches         56       59       +3     
============================================
+ Hits           1752     1766      +14     
  Misses           31       31              
  Partials         10       10              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

saynotobugsorg
saynotobugsorg previously approved these changes Dec 30, 2023
@dmfs dmfs merged commit be906bc into main Dec 30, 2023
3 checks passed
@dmfs dmfs deleted the 157-orderedBy-quality branch December 30, 2023 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants