Skip to content

unapplySeq is useful when number of subvalues ISN'T fixed #188

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2020
Merged

unapplySeq is useful when number of subvalues ISN'T fixed #188

merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2020

Conversation

joelittlejohn
Copy link
Contributor

Please do sanity check my change here - have I misread the sentence?

unapplySeq is useful when the number of sub-values isn't fixed, right?

juanpedromoreno
juanpedromoreno approved these changes May 18, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Thanks @joelittlejohn

@juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno merged commit 5bb8884 into scala-exercises:master May 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@joelittlejohn @juanpedromoreno