Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update broken link to contextual abstractions in SIP minutes #1891

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2021
Merged

Update broken link to contextual abstractions in SIP minutes #1891

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _sips/minutes/2019-03-13-sip-minutes.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ Seb: there are two widely different things in this proposal that are mixed toget

Martin: avoiding the word implicit was something of an exercise, to avoid confusing the old system and new system in the minds of people who know the old system. In the long run, it might be better to just go ahead and talk about "implicits".

Seth: how will we teach this from scratch? Martin: pages like [https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/contextual/instance-defs.html](https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/contextual/instance-defs.html) actually are an attempt at this.
Seth: how will we teach this from scratch? Martin: pages like [https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/contextual/givens.html](https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/contextual/givens.html) actually are an attempt at this.

Miles: in the `ListOrd[T]` example, it's essentially a function definition, a function from `Ord[T]` to `Ord[List[T]]`, why doesn't it look like I'm writing a function?

Expand Down