Skip to content

relicense under Apache 2.0? #24

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
SethTisue opened this issue Jan 29, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

relicense under Apache 2.0? #24

SethTisue opened this issue Jan 29, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees
@SethTisue

Comments

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

just like e.g. scala/scala-xml#242 and scala/scala-parser-combinators#184

@Ichoran any objection?
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

ping @Ichoran, can I go ahead and do this?

@SethTisue SethTisue self-assigned this Feb 13, 2019
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

ping @Ichoran

@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor

Ichoran commented Feb 20, 2019

@SethTisue - 👍 Apache 2 is fine.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

I moved this copyright notice from the old LICENSE file into the new NOTICE file:

Copyright (c) 2014-2019, Ichoran

but it seems a little iffy. would it be okay if I changed it to a Lightbend copyright? or to "Rex Kerr"?

@Ichoran
Copy link
Contributor

Ichoran commented Feb 20, 2019

Yeah, Lightbend copyright is fine. Or Rex Kerr. I'm not sure why I thought Ichoran was a good thing to put in the copyright, but I'm pretty sure there are more Rex Kerrs than Ichorans. Anyway, this stuff is really Lightbend's.

SethTisue added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2019
@SethTisue
reassign copyright to Lightbend
3610829 
as per Rex's go-ahead at
#24 (comment)
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

thanks Rex! 3610829

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@SethTisue SethTisue

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@SethTisue @Ichoran