Skip to content

Type desugared transparent inline def unapply call in the correct mode #20108

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

Type desugared transparent inline def unapply call in the correct mode #20108

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024

Conversation

@smarter
Copy link
Member

@smarter smarter commented Apr 5, 2024

This regressed in 5648f12.

Fixes #20107.

@smarter smarter requested a review from nicolasstucki April 5, 2024 19:19
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit 4ea930b into scala:main Apr 9, 2024
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the fix-inline-unapply-typed branch April 9, 2024 07:30
@Kordyjan Kordyjan added this to the 3.5.0 milestone May 10, 2024
@WojciechMazur WojciechMazur mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2024
Merged
WojciechMazur added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
@WojciechMazur
Backport "Type desugared transparent inline def unapply call in the…
66981bc 
… correct mode" to LTS (#21049)

Backports #20108 to the LTS branch.

PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki nicolasstucki approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

3.5.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Regression in 3.4.1: spurious error when using transparent inline def unapply

3 participants

@smarter @nicolasstucki @Kordyjan