- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 1.1k
 
Drop phase.isTyper use in isLegalPrefix/asf #21954
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
            noti0na1
  merged 3 commits into
  scala:main
from
dwijnand:i17222-anon-mixin-inline-match-erasedValue-summonInline
  
      
      
   
  Nov 22, 2024 
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            Drop phase.isTyper use in isLegalPrefix/asf #21954
                    noti0na1
  merged 3 commits into
  scala:main
from
dwijnand:i17222-anon-mixin-inline-match-erasedValue-summonInline
  
      
      
   
  Nov 22, 2024 
              
            Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    Note that "asSeenFrom" (aka asf) is used by SymDenotation#findMember,
which is used by TypeComparer's "hasMatchingMember", as a part of
"compareRefinedSlow".
Previously (using the minimisation in i17222.8.scala) `summonOne` is
inlined during the "inlining" phase, while "summonInline" is inlined
during typing.  The result is that during inlining we fail to find
`Reader[BC, Int]` because we incorrectly consider `A{type F = Int}` as
stable.
    
              
                    noti0na1
  
              
              reviewed
              
                  
                    Nov 20, 2024 
                  
              
              
            
            
              
                    noti0na1
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Nov 20, 2024 
                  
              
              
            
            
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
  This was referenced Feb 24, 2025 
      
    
  smarter 
      added a commit
        to dotty-staging/dotty
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 26, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
The body of this method used to read:
    pre.isStable || !ctx.phase.isTyper
but was changed to drop the second condition in scala#21954 (originally included in
3.6.4-RC1, reverted from 3.6.4 final but back in 3.7). This has led to a
number of regressions, the last ones discussed in scala#23423.
To make the testcases added in scala#21594 pass, this PR proposes a less drastic
change: relax isLegalPrefix as before, unless we're doing an implicit search.
This should dramatically reduce the possibility for regressions.
    
    
  smarter 
      added a commit
        to dotty-staging/dotty
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 26, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
The body of isLegalPrefix used to read:
    pre.isStable || !ctx.phase.isTyper
but was changed to drop the second condition in scala#21954 (originally included in
3.6.4-RC1, reverted from 3.6.4 final but back in 3.7). This has led to a
number of regressions, the last ones discussed in scala#23423.
To make the testcases added in scala#21594 pass, this PR proposes a less drastic
change: relax isLegalPrefix as before, unless we're doing an implicit search.
This should dramatically reduce the possibility for regressions.
Fixes scala#23423.
Fixes scala#22676.
    
    
  smarter 
      added a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 27, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
The body of isLegalPrefix used to read:
    pre.isStable || !ctx.phase.isTyper
but was changed to drop the second condition in #21954 (originally
included in 3.6.4-RC1, reverted from 3.6.4 final but back in 3.7). This
has led to a number of regressions, the last ones discussed in #23423.
To make the testcases added in #21594 pass, this PR proposes a less
drastic change: relax isLegalPrefix as before, unless we're doing an
implicit search. This should dramatically reduce the possibility for
regressions.
Fixes #23423.
Fixes #22676.
    
    
  tgodzik 
      pushed a commit
        to scala/scala3-lts
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 30, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
The body of isLegalPrefix used to read:
    pre.isStable || !ctx.phase.isTyper
but was changed to drop the second condition in scala#21954 (originally included in
3.6.4-RC1, reverted from 3.6.4 final but back in 3.7). This has led to a
number of regressions, the last ones discussed in scala#23423.
To make the testcases added in scala#21594 pass, this PR proposes a less drastic
change: relax isLegalPrefix as before, unless we're doing an implicit search.
This should dramatically reduce the possibility for regressions.
Fixes scala#23423.
Fixes scala#22676.
    
    
  tgodzik 
      added a commit
        to scala/scala3-lts
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jun 30, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
The body of isLegalPrefix used to read:
    pre.isStable || !ctx.phase.isTyper
but was changed to drop the second condition in scala#21954 (originally included in
3.6.4-RC1, reverted from 3.6.4 final but back in 3.7). This has led to a
number of regressions, the last ones discussed in scala#23423.
To make the testcases added in scala#21594 pass, this PR proposes a less drastic
change: relax isLegalPrefix as before, unless we're doing an implicit search.
This should dramatically reduce the possibility for regressions.
Fixes scala#23423.
Fixes scala#22676.
[Cherry-picked 2e4bc0a][modified]
    
    
  WojciechMazur 
      pushed a commit
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Jul 16, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
The body of isLegalPrefix used to read:
    pre.isStable || !ctx.phase.isTyper
but was changed to drop the second condition in #21954 (originally included in
3.6.4-RC1, reverted from 3.6.4 final but back in 3.7). This has led to a
number of regressions, the last ones discussed in #23423.
To make the testcases added in #21594 pass, this PR proposes a less drastic
change: relax isLegalPrefix as before, unless we're doing an implicit search.
This should dramatically reduce the possibility for regressions.
Fixes #23423.
Fixes #22676.
[Cherry-picked 2e4bc0a]
    
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Note that "asSeenFrom" (aka asf) is used by SymDenotation#findMember,
which is used by TypeComparer's "hasMatchingMember", as a part of
"compareRefinedSlow".
Previously (using the minimisation in i17222.8.scala)
summonOneisinlined during the "inlining" phase, while "summonInline" is inlined
during typing. The result is that during inlining we fail to find
Reader[BC, Int]because we incorrectly considerA{type F = Int}asstable.
Fixes #17222