Fix separation checking for function results #23927
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
odersky
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2025
WojciechMazur
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2025
) Backports #23927 to the 3.7.4. PR submitted by the release tooling. [skip ci]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #23726.
Instead of replying on the dependencies between function result and parameters, which is unreliable as shown in that issue (#23726), we collect the captures that will interfere with the hidden sets of formal parameters directly, and check separation between this set and the hidden sets.