-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix #2578: (part 2) Make for-generators filter only if prefixed with case
.
#6448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
74ff5ef
Allow case in front of generators (syntax and parsing)
odersky 0b70278
Make GenFrom after filter irrefutable
odersky ca29d33
Drop IrrefutableGenFrom
odersky b9ecfc0
Filter only for generators starting with `case`.
odersky c2a41b6
Refine checking mode for for generators
odersky 82b1eb8
Add precision to error message
odersky c52b8f5
Piggy-back unrelated tests
odersky c63519c
Fix wording in error message
odersky 8196a71
Fixes to support `case id: T <- ...`
odersky af921ed
Add doc page
odersky a1152f7
Add run test
odersky 8d2db38
Fix typo in doc
odersky af116ae
Fix typo
odersky 9a7c709
Always filter generators prefixed with `case`.
odersky File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fact that
@unchecked
is also added to irrefutable patterns really confused me until I understood that annotating the selector only affects exhaustivity checks and not irrefutability checks. Perhaps we could note this in the doc?