-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Fix #8690: the signature for product should come from expected type #8698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
test performance with #fast please |
performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 0 running. |
Performance test finished successfully: Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/8698/ to see the changes. Benchmarks is based on merging with master (a6b47e4) |
test performance please |
performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 0 running. |
Performance test finished successfully: Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/8698/ to see the changes. Benchmarks is based on merging with master (a6b47e4) |
test performance please |
performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 1 running. |
Performance test finished successfully: Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/8698/ to see the changes. Benchmarks is based on merging with master (f64e879) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice simplification
def caseClass = unappSym.owner.linkedClass | ||
|
||
// println("scrutineeTp = " + scrutineeTp.show) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Forgot to remove this
Fix #8690: the signature for product should come from expected type