Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove useless config elements #2534

Merged

Conversation

benzekrimaha
Copy link
Contributor

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha commented Sep 3, 2024

Issue : BB-520

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Sep 3, 2024

Hello benzekrimaha,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2024 10:56
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/BB-520-remove-useless-config-elements branch from 57faf98 to 51bbe72 Compare September 3, 2024 10:57
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Sep 3, 2024
lib/Config.js Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/Config.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/BB-520-remove-useless-config-elements branch from c12e084 to 1ad8a82 Compare September 3, 2024 13:30
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha changed the base branch from development/8.5 to development/8.7 September 4, 2024 13:52
@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/BB-520-remove-useless-config-elements branch 2 times, most recently from 1c1bb54 to 2c1daa1 Compare September 4, 2024 13:53
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.56%. Comparing base (a1c64a4) to head (b8bd575).
Report is 1 commits behind head on development/8.7.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Config.js 64.95% <ø> (+0.25%) ⬆️
lib/config.joi.js 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 66.66% <ø> (ø)
Core Library 74.32% <ø> (+0.21%) ⬆️
Ingestion 69.24% <ø> (ø)
Lifecycle 75.07% <ø> (ø)
Oplog Populator 82.95% <ø> (ø)
Replication 57.42% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/8.7    #2534      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            69.47%   69.56%   +0.08%     
===================================================
  Files                  194      194              
  Lines                12794    12792       -2     
===================================================
+ Hits                  8889     8899      +10     
+ Misses                3895     3883      -12     
  Partials                10       10              
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.66% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
api:routes 9.55% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
bucket-scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
ingestion 12.51% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
lib 7.54% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
lifecycle 19.43% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
notification 0.88% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
replication 19.04% <ø> (+0.08%) ⬆️
unit 43.33% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@benzekrimaha benzekrimaha force-pushed the improvement/BB-520-remove-useless-config-elements branch from 2c1daa1 to b8bd575 Compare October 10, 2024 13:40
@benzekrimaha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 10, 2024
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 10, 2024
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 10, 2024
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 10, 2024
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Oct 10, 2024
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Oct 10, 2024

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/8.7

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.5
  • development/8.6

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-520.

Goodbye benzekrimaha.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit b8bd575 into development/8.7 Oct 10, 2024
9 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/BB-520-remove-useless-config-elements branch October 10, 2024 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants