This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
Pull in bpf/for-next to receive multiple struct_ops feature #157
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There are various users of get_vm_area() + ioremap_page_range() APIs. Enforce that get_vm_area() was requested as VM_IOREMAP type and range passed to ioremap_page_range() matches created vm_area to avoid accidentally ioremap-ing into wrong address range. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240305030516.41519-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
vmap/vmalloc APIs are used to map a set of pages into contiguous kernel virtual space. get_vm_area() with appropriate flag is used to request an area of kernel address range. It's used for vmalloc, vmap, ioremap, xen use cases. - vmalloc use case dominates the usage. Such vm areas have VM_ALLOC flag. - the areas created by vmap() function should be tagged with VM_MAP. - ioremap areas are tagged with VM_IOREMAP. BPF would like to extend the vmap API to implement a lazily-populated sparse, yet contiguous kernel virtual space. Introduce VM_SPARSE flag and vm_area_map_pages(area, start_addr, count, pages) API to map a set of pages within a given area. It has the same sanity checks as vmap() does. It also checks that get_vm_area() was created with VM_SPARSE flag which identifies such areas in /proc/vmallocinfo and returns zero pages on read through /proc/kcore. The next commits will introduce bpf_arena which is a sparsely populated shared memory region between bpf program and user space process. It will map privately-managed pages into a sparse vm area with the following steps: // request virtual memory region during bpf prog verification area = get_vm_area(area_size, VM_SPARSE); // on demand vm_area_map_pages(area, kaddr, kend, pages); vm_area_unmap_pages(area, kaddr, kend); // after bpf program is detached and unloaded free_vm_area(area); Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240305030516.41519-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
…m_area' Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== mm: Enforce ioremap address space and introduce sparse vm_area From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> v3 -> v4 - dropped VM_XEN patch for now. It will be in the follow up. - fixed constant as pointed out by Mike v2 -> v3 - added Christoph's reviewed-by to patch 1 - cap commit log lines to 75 chars - factored out common checks in patch 3 into helper - made vm_area_unmap_pages() return void There are various users of kernel virtual address space: vmalloc, vmap, ioremap, xen. - vmalloc use case dominates the usage. Such vm areas have VM_ALLOC flag and these areas are treated differently by KASAN. - the areas created by vmap() function should be tagged with VM_MAP (as majority of the users do). - ioremap areas are tagged with VM_IOREMAP and vm area start is aligned to size of the area unlike vmalloc/vmap. - there is also xen usage that is marked as VM_IOREMAP, but it doesn't call ioremap_page_range() unlike all other VM_IOREMAP users. To clean this up a bit, enforce that ioremap_page_range() checks the range and VM_IOREMAP flag. In addition BPF would like to reserve regions of kernel virtual address space and populate it lazily, similar to xen use cases. For that reason, introduce VM_SPARSE flag and vm_area_[un]map_pages() helpers to populate this sparse area. In the end the /proc/vmallocinfo will show "vmalloc" "vmap" "ioremap" "sparse" categories for different kinds of address regions. ioremap, sparse will return zero when dumped through /proc/kcore ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240305030516.41519-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Introduce may_goto instruction that from the verifier pov is similar to
open coded iterators bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() and bpf_loop() helper, but it
doesn't iterate any objects.
In assembly 'may_goto' is a nop most of the time until bpf runtime has to
terminate the program for whatever reason. In the current implementation
may_goto has a hidden counter, but other mechanisms can be used.
For programs written in C the later patch introduces 'cond_break' macro
that combines 'may_goto' with 'break' statement and has similar semantics:
cond_break is a nop until bpf runtime has to break out of this loop.
It can be used in any normal "for" or "while" loop, like
for (i = zero; i < cnt; cond_break, i++) {
The verifier recognizes that may_goto is used in the program, reserves
additional 8 bytes of stack, initializes them in subprog prologue, and
replaces may_goto instruction with:
aux_reg = *(u64 *)(fp - 40)
if aux_reg == 0 goto pc+off
aux_reg -= 1
*(u64 *)(fp - 40) = aux_reg
may_goto instruction can be used by LLVM to implement __builtin_memcpy,
__builtin_strcmp.
may_goto is not a full substitute for bpf_for() macro.
bpf_for() doesn't have induction variable that verifiers sees,
so 'i' in bpf_for(i, 0, 100) is seen as imprecise and bounded.
But when the code is written as:
for (i = 0; i < 100; cond_break, i++)
the verifier see 'i' as precise constant zero,
hence cond_break (aka may_goto) doesn't help to converge the loop.
A static or global variable can be used as a workaround:
static int zero = 0;
for (i = zero; i < 100; cond_break, i++) // works!
may_goto works well with arena pointers that don't need to be bounds
checked on access. Load/store from arena returns imprecise unbounded
scalar and loops with may_goto pass the verifier.
Reserve new opcode BPF_JMP | BPF_JCOND for may_goto insn.
JCOND stands for conditional pseudo jump.
Since goto_or_nop insn was proposed, it may use the same opcode.
may_goto vs goto_or_nop can be distinguished by src_reg:
code = BPF_JMP | BPF_JCOND
src_reg = 0 - may_goto
src_reg = 1 - goto_or_nop
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306031929.42666-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
When open code iterators, bpf_loop or may_goto are used the following two states are equivalent and safe to prune the search: cur state: fp-8_w=scalar(id=3,smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=11,var_off=(0x0; 0xf)) old state: fp-8_rw=scalar(id=2,smin=umin=smin32=umin32=1,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=11,var_off=(0x0; 0xf)) In other words "exact" state match should ignore liveness and precision marks, since open coded iterator logic didn't complete their propagation, reg_old->type == NOT_INIT && reg_cur->type != NOT_INIT is also not safe to prune while looping, but range_within logic that applies to scalars, ptr_to_mem, map_value, pkt_ptr is safe to rely on. Avoid doing such comparison when regular infinite loop detection logic is used, otherwise bounded loop logic will declare such "infinite loop" as false positive. Such example is in progs/verifier_loops1.c not_an_inifinite_loop(). Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306031929.42666-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Use may_goto instruction to implement cond_break macro.
Ideally the macro should be written as:
asm volatile goto(".byte 0xe5;
.byte 0;
.short %l[l_break] ...
.long 0;
but LLVM doesn't recognize fixup of 2 byte PC relative yet.
Hence use
asm volatile goto(".byte 0xe5;
.byte 0;
.long %l[l_break] ...
.short 0;
that produces correct asm on little endian.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306031929.42666-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add tests for may_goto instruction via cond_break macro. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306031929.42666-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== bpf: Introduce may_goto and cond_break From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> v5 -> v6: - Rename BPF_JMA to BPF_JCOND - Addressed Andrii's review comments v4 -> v5: - rewrote patch 1 to avoid fake may_goto_reg and use 'u32 may_goto_cnt' instead. This way may_goto handling is similar to bpf_loop() processing. - fixed bug in patch 2 that RANGE_WITHIN should not use rold->type == NOT_INIT as a safe signal. - patch 3 fixed negative offset computation in cond_break macro - using bpf_arena and cond_break recompiled lib/glob.c as bpf prog and it works! It will be added as a selftest to arena series. v3 -> v4: - fix drained issue reported by John. may_goto insn could be implemented with sticky state (once reaches 0 it stays 0), but the verifier shouldn't assume that. It has to explore both branches. Arguably drained iterator state shouldn't be there at all. bpf_iter_css_next() is not sticky. Can be fixed, but auditing all iterators for stickiness. That's an orthogonal discussion. - explained JMA name reasons in patch 1 - fixed test_progs-no_alu32 issue and added another test v2 -> v3: Major change - drop bpf_can_loop() kfunc and introduce may_goto instruction instead kfunc is a function call while may_goto doesn't consume any registers and LLVM can produce much better code due to less register pressure. - instead of counting from zero to BPF_MAX_LOOPS start from it instead and break out of the loop when count reaches zero - use may_goto instruction in cond_break macro - recognize that 'exact' state comparison doesn't need to be truly exact. regsafe() should ignore precision and liveness marks, but range_within logic is safe to use while evaluating open coded iterators. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306031929.42666-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
E.g. allow the following struct_ops definitions:
struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 { int (*test)(void); };
struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 { int (*test)(void); };
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 a = { .test = ... }
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 b = { .test = ... }
Where both bpf_testmod_ops__v1 and bpf_testmod_ops__v2 would be
resolved as 'struct bpf_testmod_ops' from kernel BTF.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Enforce the following existing limitation on struct_ops programs based
on kernel BTF id instead of program-local BTF id:
struct_ops BPF prog can be re-used between multiple .struct_ops &
.struct_ops.link as long as it's the same struct_ops struct
definition and the same function pointer field
This allows reusing same BPF program for versioned struct_ops map
definitions, e.g.:
SEC("struct_ops/test")
int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
struct some_ops___v1 { int (*test)(void); };
struct some_ops___v2 { int (*test)(void); };
SEC(".struct_ops.link") struct some_ops___v1 a = { .test = foo }
SEC(".struct_ops.link") struct some_ops___v2 b = { .test = foo }
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Skip load steps for struct_ops maps not marked for automatic creation.
This should allow to load bpf object in situations like below:
SEC("struct_ops/foo") int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
SEC("struct_ops/bar") int BPF_PROG(bar) { ... }
struct test_ops___v1 {
int (*foo)(void);
};
struct test_ops___v2 {
int (*foo)(void);
int (*does_not_exist)(void);
};
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct test_ops___v1 map_for_old = {
.test_1 = (void *)foo
};
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct test_ops___v2 map_for_new = {
.test_1 = (void *)foo,
.does_not_exist = (void *)bar
};
Suppose program is loaded on old kernel that does not have definition
for 'does_not_exist' struct_ops member. After this commit it would be
possible to load such object file after the following tweaks:
bpf_program__set_autoload(skel->progs.bar, false);
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_for_new, false);
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Extend struct_ops_module test case to check if it is possible to use '___' suffixes for struct_ops type specification. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Several test_progs tests already capture libbpf log in order to check
for some expected output, e.g bpf_tcp_ca.c, kfunc_dynptr_param.c,
log_buf.c and a few others.
This commit provides a, hopefully, simple API to capture libbpf log
w/o necessity to define new print callback in each test:
/* Creates a global memstream capturing INFO and WARN level output
* passed to libbpf_print_fn.
* Returns 0 on success, negative value on failure.
* On failure the description is printed using PRINT_FAIL and
* current test case is marked as fail.
*/
int start_libbpf_log_capture(void)
/* Destroys global memstream created by start_libbpf_log_capture().
* Returns a pointer to captured data which has to be freed.
* Returned buffer is null terminated.
*/
char *stop_libbpf_log_capture(void)
The intended usage is as follows:
if (start_libbpf_log_capture())
return;
use_libbpf();
char *log = stop_libbpf_log_capture();
ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(log, "... expected ...", "expected some message");
free(log);
As a safety measure, free(start_libbpf_log_capture()) is invoked in the
epilogue of the test_progs.c:run_one_test().
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
When loading struct_ops programs kernel requires BTF id of the struct_ops type and member index for attachment point inside that type. This makes impossible to use same BPF program in several struct_ops maps that have different struct_ops type. Check if libbpf rejects such BPF objects files. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Check that bpf_map__set_autocreate() can be used to disable automatic creation for struct_ops maps. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Automatically select which struct_ops programs to load depending on
which struct_ops maps are selected for automatic creation.
E.g. for the BPF code below:
SEC("struct_ops/test_1") int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
SEC("struct_ops/test_2") int BPF_PROG(bar) { ... }
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct test_ops___v1 A = {
.foo = (void *)foo
};
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct test_ops___v2 B = {
.foo = (void *)foo,
.bar = (void *)bar,
};
And the following libbpf API calls:
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.A, true);
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.B, false);
The autoload would be enabled for program 'foo' and disabled for
program 'bar'.
During load, for each struct_ops program P, referenced from some
struct_ops map M:
- set P.autoload = true if M.autocreate is true for some M;
- set P.autoload = false if M.autocreate is false for all M;
- don't change P.autoload, if P is not referenced from any map.
Do this after bpf_object__init_kern_struct_ops_maps()
to make sure that shadow vars assignment is done.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Check that autocreate flags of struct_ops map cause autoload of struct_ops corresponding programs: - when struct_ops program is referenced only from a map for which autocreate is set to false, that program should not be loaded; - when struct_ops program with autoload == false is set to be used from a map with autocreate == true using shadow var, that program should be loaded; - when struct_ops program is not referenced from any map object load should fail. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-10-eddyz87@gmail.com
The next patch would add two new section names for struct_ops maps.
To make working with multiple struct_ops sections more convenient:
- remove fields like elf_state->st_ops_{shndx,link_shndx};
- mark section descriptions hosting struct_ops as
elf_sec_desc->sec_type == SEC_ST_OPS;
After these changes struct_ops sections could be processed uniformly
by iterating bpf_object->efile.secs entries.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-11-eddyz87@gmail.com
Allow using two new section names for struct_ops maps:
- SEC("?.struct_ops")
- SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
To specify maps that have bpf_map->autocreate == false after open.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-12-eddyz87@gmail.com
Optional struct_ops maps are defined using question mark at the start
of the section name, e.g.:
SEC("?.struct_ops")
struct test_ops optional_map = { ... };
This commit teaches libbpf to detect if kernel allows '?' prefix
in datasec names, and if it doesn't then to rewrite such names
by replacing '?' with '_', e.g.:
DATASEC ?.struct_ops -> DATASEC _.struct_ops
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-13-eddyz87@gmail.com
Check that "?.struct_ops" and "?.struct_ops.link" section names define struct_ops maps with autocreate == false after open. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-14-eddyz87@gmail.com
The intent is to allow libbpf to use SEC("?.struct_ops") to identify
struct_ops maps that are optional, e.g. like in the following BPF code:
SEC("?.struct_ops")
struct test_ops optional_map = { ... };
Which yields the following BTF:
...
[13] DATASEC '?.struct_ops' size=0 vlen=...
...
To load such BTF libbpf rewrites DATASEC name before load.
After this patch the rewrite won't be necessary.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-15-eddyz87@gmail.com
Two test cases to verify that '?' and other printable characters are allowed in BTF DATASEC names: - DATASEC with name "?.foo bar:buz" should be accepted; - type with name "?foo" should be rejected. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240306104529.6453-16-eddyz87@gmail.com
…-maps'
Eduard Zingerman says:
====================
libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps
Tweak struct_ops related APIs to allow the following features:
- specify version suffixes for stuct_ops map types;
- share same BPF program between several map definitions with
different local BTF types, assuming only maps with same
kernel BTF type would be selected for load;
- toggle autocreate flag for struct_ops maps;
- automatically toggle autoload for struct_ops programs referenced
from struct_ops maps, depending on autocreate status of the
corresponding map;
- use SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
to define struct_ops maps with autocreate == false after object open.
This would allow loading programs like below:
SEC("struct_ops/foo") int BPF_PROG(foo) { ... }
SEC("struct_ops/bar") int BPF_PROG(bar) { ... }
struct bpf_testmod_ops___v1 {
int (*foo)(void);
};
struct bpf_testmod_ops___v2 {
int (*foo)(void);
int (*bar)(void);
};
/* Assume kernel type name to be 'test_ops' */
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct test_ops___v1 map_v1 = {
/* Program 'foo' shared by maps with
* different local BTF type
*/
.foo = (void *)foo
};
SEC(".struct_ops.link")
struct test_ops___v2 map_v2 = {
.foo = (void *)foo,
.bar = (void *)bar
};
Assuming the following tweaks are done before loading:
/* to load v1 */
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v1, true);
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v2, false);
/* to load v2 */
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v1, false);
bpf_map__set_autocreate(skel->maps.map_v2, true);
Patch #8 ties autocreate and autoload flags for struct_ops maps and
programs.
Changelog:
- v3 [3] -> v4:
- changes for multiple styling suggestions from Andrii;
- patch #5: libbpf log capture now happens for LIBBPF_INFO and
LIBBPF_WARN messages and does not depend on verbosity flags
(Andrii);
- patch #6: fixed runtime crash caused by conflict with newly added
test case struct_ops_multi_pages;
- patch #7: fixed free of possibly uninitialized pointer (Daniel)
- patch #8: simpler algorithm to detect which programs to autoload
(Andrii);
- patch #9: added assertions for autoload flag after object load
(Andrii);
- patch #12: DATASEC name rewrite in libbpf is now done inplace, no
new strings added to BTF (Andrii);
- patch #14: allow any printable characters in DATASEC names when
kernel validates BTF (Andrii)
- v2 [2] -> v3:
- moved patch #8 logic to be fully done on load
(requested by Andrii in offlist discussion);
- in patch #9 added test case for shadow vars and
autocreate/autoload interaction.
- v1 [1] -> v2:
- fixed memory leak in patch #1 (Kui-Feng);
- improved error messages in patch #2 (Martin, Andrii);
- in bad_struct_ops selftest from patch #6 added .test_2
map member setup (David);
- added utility functions to capture libbpf log from selftests (David)
- in selftests replaced usage of ...__open_and_load by separate
calls to ..._open() and ..._load() (Andrii);
- removed serial_... in selftest definitions (Andrii);
- improved comments in selftest struct_ops_autocreate
from patch #7 (David);
- removed autoload toggling logic incompatible with shadow variables
from bpf_map__set_autocreate(), instead struct_ops programs
autoload property is computed at struct_ops maps load phase,
see patch #8 (Kui-Feng, Martin, Andrii);
- added support for SEC("?.struct_ops") and SEC("?.struct_ops.link")
(Andrii).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240227204556.17524-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240302011920.15302-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240304225156.24765-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306104529.6453-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.