Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Netcdf #53

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jan 8, 2020
Merged

Netcdf #53

merged 22 commits into from
Jan 8, 2020

Conversation

rcnijzink
Copy link
Contributor

I moved all the write-subroutines to a separate file, and added here netcdf-functionality.

Copy link
Owner

@schymans schymans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great, thanks! However, could you verify if the old output can still be generated and if the model can still be compiled and run without netcdf? The code does not look like it. It would also be good to include the netcdf option in the documentation.

VOM_Fortran/VOM-docu/source/outputfiles.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
VOM_Fortran/VOM-docu/source/quickstart.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
VOM_Fortran/VOM-code/modules.f90 Show resolved Hide resolved
@rcnijzink
Copy link
Contributor Author

So the only issue here is that you have to have netcdf-fortran installed before compiling. Will check if I could add something to look for that in the Makefile, but as you use a library ( you do "use netcdf" before a subroutine runs that uses it) this might be problematic. Installation is however just a simple one liner.

@schymans schymans merged commit 5316ef9 into schymans:master Jan 8, 2020
@rcnijzink rcnijzink deleted the netcdf branch January 13, 2020 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants