fix: Downgrade jupyter-client for papermill to work

[matthewfeickert]

Description

As a temporary fix to Issue #2104 (which is because of nteract/papermill#711), downgrade jupyter-client to a version less than v8.0.0 so that papermill is able to run. This is not a sufficient fix and an alternative to using papermill should be considered.

Checklist Before Requesting Reviewer

• Tests are passing
• "WIP" removed from the title of the pull request
• Selected an Assignee for the PR to be responsible for the log summary

Before Merging

For the PR Assignees:

• Summarize commit messages into a comprehensive review of the PR

* As a temporary fix to Issue #2104, downgrade jupyter-client to a
  version less than v8.0.0 so that papermill is able to run.
  This is not a sufficient fix and an alternative to using papermill
  should be considered.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 98.30% // Head: 98.30% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (5568a3c) compared to base (5568a3c).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 5568a3c differs from pull request most recent head a8769b3. Consider uploading reports for the commit a8769b3 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2105   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.30%   98.30%           
=======================================
  Files          69       69           
  Lines        4531     4531           
  Branches      645      645           
=======================================
  Hits         4454     4454           
  Misses         45       45           
  Partials       32       32           

Flag	Coverage Δ
contrib	97.88% <0.00%> (ø)
doctest	61.15% <0.00%> (ø)
unittests-3.10	96.31% <0.00%> (ø)
unittests-3.8	96.33% <0.00%> (ø)
unittests-3.9	96.35% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[matthewfeickert]

Notebook tests are passing again with this:

...
collecting ... collected 12 items

tests/test_notebooks.py::test_hello_world PASSED                         [  8%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_xml_importexport PASSED                    [ 16%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_statisticalanalysis PASSED                 [ 25%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_shapefactor PASSED                         [ 33%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_multichannel_coupled_histos PASSED         [ 41%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_multibinpois PASSED                        [ 50%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_pullplot PASSED                            [ 58%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_impactplot PASSED                          [ 66%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_toys PASSED                                [ 75%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_learn_interpolationcodes PASSED            [ 83%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_learn_tensorizinginterpolations PASSED     [ 91%]
tests/test_notebooks.py::test_learn_using_calculators PASSED             [100%]
...

[matthewfeickert]

I'm going to approve and merge this myself so that the notebook tests don't time out after 6 hours tonight. As always, PRs approved by a single core dev can be reverted as needed by the rest of the dev team.