-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: define objects over base fields #52
base: feat/goldilocks-spartan
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feat: define objects over base fields #52
Conversation
88029e3
to
5f86ada
Compare
…roof struct." This reverts commit 4b160ca.
ops_addr: Vec<DensePolynomial<S, Ext>>, | ||
read_ts: Vec<DensePolynomial<S, Ext>>, | ||
audit_ts: DensePolynomial<S, Ext>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These multilinear polynomials should be defined over Base
.
let mut ops_addr_vec: Vec<DensePolynomial<S, Ext>> = Vec::new(); | ||
let mut read_ts_vec: Vec<DensePolynomial<S, Ext>> = Vec::new(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see above comments.
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub struct MultiSparseMatPolynomialAsDense<S: SpartanExtensionField> { | ||
batch_size: usize, | ||
val: Vec<DensePolynomial<S>>, | ||
val: Vec<DensePolynomial<S, Ext>>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be defined over Base
. It's the M[i,j]
where M \in {A, B, C}
.
comb_ops: DensePolynomial<S, Ext>, | ||
comb_mem: DensePolynomial<S, Ext>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These two multilinear polynomials should also be defined over Base
.
Fixes #50.