Skip to content

Issues: sctplab/pr-sctp-improved

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

16 Open 2 Closed
16 Open 2 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Timing-Problems on Sender Side Implementation bug
#18 opened Jan 15, 2017 by TheAomx
@tuexen
sid/ssn values are reported multiple times in one FORWARD-TSN Chunk enhancement
#17 opened Dec 13, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
INIT-Chunk with cropped FORWARD-TSN-supported parameter is accepted bug
#16 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
INIT-Chunk with invalid TLV-length is accepted bug
#15 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
Upon receipt of invalid FORWARD-TSN-Chunk with too long tlv-value no ABORT-Chunk is sent bug
#14 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
Incoming SACK-Chunks are allowed when NR-SACK-Chunks are listed at the supported-extensions bug
#13 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
1
After calling close no SHUTDOWN-Chunk is sent bug
#12 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
Information in nr_gap-Blocks in NR-SACK-Chunks are not used optimally enhancement
#11 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
No Bundling of I-DATA and I-FORWARD-TSN Chunks enhancement
#10 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
Already abandoned user messages are not discarded as early as possible enhancement
#9 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
I-FORWARD-TSN-Chunk is used although support has not been indicated by both endpoints bug
#7 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
3
I-FORWARD-TSN-Chunk is accepted when no I-DATA-Support is announced at handshake bug
#6 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
No Bundling of DATA and FORWARD-TSN-Chunks enhancement
#5 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
Unordered user message is not delivered if two FORWARD-TSN-Chunks are bundled bug
#4 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
Unordered user messages can not be received out of order enhancement
#3 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
The Forward-TSN-supported parameter is not listed at the unrecognized parameters bug
#2 opened Dec 12, 2016 by TheAomx
@tuexen
4
ProTip! What’s not been updated in a month: updated:<2024-10-05.