-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix view behavior for AwkwardArrays #1070
Open
grst
wants to merge
12
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
ak-array-views
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b23eda3
Use __record__ instead of __list__ to store behavior
grst b640617
Fix views of views
grst 843833f
Update anndata/_core/views.py
grst 8aa09cc
Remove all custom code for views
grst 86c5ff8
WIP add test cases
grst a01b80e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into ak-array-views
grst dfe7008
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 8b14e57
More test cases
grst 4870553
Add comment about view behavior
grst 257c063
Merge branch 'main' into ak-array-views
grst 4b34598
Fix akward array view test
grst fdeff90
Fix that awkward arrays in an awyward array view could not be modified.
grst File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should use
with_name
, so that we can traverse into the layout to find the record-nodeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I imagine that after our dicsussion @grst could not get that working (see #1040 (comment))
Is there a reason traversing is better than what we have (assuming @grst could not get the
with_name
working)? We only ever deal with this at a "top level."