forked from spring-projects/spring-framework
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
This commit documents using JSpecify instead of the now deprecated Spring null-safety annotations. Closes spring-projectsgh-28797
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
122 additions
and
67 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
156 changes: 117 additions & 39 deletions
156
framework-docs/modules/ROOT/pages/core/null-safety.adoc
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,57 +1,135 @@ | ||
[[null-safety]] | ||
= Null-safety | ||
|
||
Although Java does not let you express null-safety with its type system, the Spring Framework | ||
provides the following annotations in the `org.springframework.lang` package to let you | ||
declare nullability of APIs and fields: | ||
Although Java does not let you express null-safety with its type system, the Spring Framework codebase is annotated with | ||
https://jspecify.dev/docs/start-here/[JSpecify] annotations to declare the nullability of APIs, fields and related type | ||
usages. Reading the https://jspecify.dev/docs/user-guide/[JSpecify user guide] is highly recommended in order to get | ||
familiar with those annotations and semantics. | ||
|
||
* {spring-framework-api}/lang/Nullable.html[`@Nullable`]: Annotation to indicate that a | ||
specific parameter, return value, or field can be `null`. | ||
* {spring-framework-api}/lang/NonNull.html[`@NonNull`]: Annotation to indicate that a specific | ||
parameter, return value, or field cannot be `null` (not needed on parameters, return values, | ||
and fields where `@NonNullApi` and `@NonNullFields` apply, respectively). | ||
* {spring-framework-api}/lang/NonNullApi.html[`@NonNullApi`]: Annotation at the package level | ||
that declares non-null as the default semantics for parameters and return values. | ||
* {spring-framework-api}/lang/NonNullFields.html[`@NonNullFields`]: Annotation at the package | ||
level that declares non-null as the default semantics for fields. | ||
The primary goal of this explicit null-safety arrangement is to prevent `NullPointerException` to be thrown at runtime via | ||
build time checks and to turn explicit nullability into a way to express the possible absence of value. It is useful in | ||
both Java by leveraging some tooling (https://github.com/uber/NullAway[NullAway] or IDEs supporting null-safety | ||
annotations such as IntelliJ IDEA or Eclipse) and Kotlin where JSpecify annotations are automatically translated to | ||
{kotlin-docs}/null-safety.html[Kotlin's null safety]. | ||
|
||
The Spring Framework itself leverages these annotations, but they can also be used in any | ||
Spring-based Java project to declare null-safe APIs and optionally null-safe fields. | ||
Nullability declarations for generic type arguments, varargs, and array elements are not supported yet. | ||
Nullability declarations are expected to be fine-tuned between Spring Framework releases, | ||
including minor ones. Nullability of types used inside method bodies is outside the | ||
scope of this feature. | ||
`@Nullable` annotations are also used at runtime to infer if a parameter is optional or not, for example via | ||
{spring-framework-api}/core/MethodParameter.html#isOptional()[`MethodParameter#isOptional`]. | ||
|
||
NOTE: Other common libraries such as Reactor and Spring Data provide null-safe APIs that | ||
use a similar nullability arrangement, delivering a consistent overall experience for | ||
Spring application developers. | ||
[[null-safety-libraries]] | ||
== Annotating libraries with JSpecify annotations | ||
|
||
As of Spring Framework 7, the Spring Framework codebase leverages JSpecify annotations to expose null-safe APIs and | ||
to check the consistency of those null-safety declarations with https://github.com/uber/NullAway[NullAway] as part of | ||
its build. It is recommended for each library depending on Spring Framework (Spring portfolio projects), as | ||
well as other libraries related to the Spring ecosystem (Reactor, Micrometer and Spring community projects), to do the | ||
same. | ||
|
||
[[null-safety-applications]] | ||
== Leveraging JSpecify annotations in Spring applications | ||
|
||
Developing applications with IDEs supporting null-safety annotations, such as IntelliJ IDEA or Eclipse, will provide | ||
warnings in Java and errors in Kotlin when the null-safety contracts are not honored, allowing Spring application | ||
developers to refine their null handling to prevent `NullPointerException` to be thrown at runtime. | ||
|
||
[[use-cases]] | ||
== Use cases | ||
Optionally, Spring application developers can annotate their codebase and use https://github.com/uber/NullAway[NullAway] | ||
to enforce null-safety during build time at application level. | ||
|
||
In addition to providing an explicit declaration for Spring Framework API nullability, | ||
these annotations can be used by an IDE (such as IDEA or Eclipse) to provide useful | ||
warnings related to null-safety in order to avoid `NullPointerException` at runtime. | ||
[[null-safety-guidelines]] | ||
== Guidelines | ||
|
||
They are also used to make Spring APIs null-safe in Kotlin projects, since Kotlin natively | ||
supports {kotlin-docs}/null-safety.html[null-safety]. More details | ||
are available in the xref:languages/kotlin/null-safety.adoc[Kotlin support documentation]. | ||
The purpose of this section is to share some guidelines proposed for using JSpecify annotations in the context of | ||
Spring-related libraries or applications. | ||
|
||
The key points to understand is that by default, the nullability of types is unknown in Java, and that non-null type | ||
usages are by far more frequent than nullable ones. In order to keep codebases readable, we typically want to define | ||
that by default, type usages are non-null unless marked as nullable for a specific scope. This is exactly the purpose of | ||
https://jspecify.dev/docs/api/org/jspecify/annotations/NullMarked.html[`@NullMarked`] that is typically set with Spring | ||
at package level via a `package-info.java` file, for example: | ||
|
||
[source,java,subs="verbatim,quotes",chomp="-packages",fold="none"] | ||
---- | ||
@NullMarked | ||
package org.springframework.core; | ||
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked; | ||
---- | ||
|
||
[[jsr-305-meta-annotations]] | ||
== JSR-305 meta-annotations | ||
In the various Java files belonging to the package, nullable type usages are defined explicitly with | ||
https://jspecify.dev/docs/api/org/jspecify/annotations/Nullable.html[`@Nullable`]. It is recommended that this | ||
annotation is specified just before the related type. | ||
|
||
Spring annotations are meta-annotated with {JSR}305[JSR 305] | ||
annotations (a dormant but widespread JSR). JSR-305 meta-annotations let tooling vendors | ||
like IDEA or Kotlin provide null-safety support in a generic way, without having to | ||
hard-code support for Spring annotations. | ||
For example, for a field: | ||
|
||
[source,java,subs="verbatim,quotes"] | ||
---- | ||
private @Nullable String fileEncoding; | ||
---- | ||
|
||
Or for method parameters and return value: | ||
|
||
[source,java,subs="verbatim,quotes"] | ||
---- | ||
public static @Nullable String buildMessage(@Nullable String message, | ||
@Nullable Throwable cause) { | ||
// ... | ||
} | ||
---- | ||
|
||
When overriding a method, nullability annotations are not inherited from the superclass method. That means those | ||
nullability annotations should be repeated if you just want to override the implementation and keep the same API | ||
nullability. | ||
|
||
With arrays and varargs, you need to be able to differentiate the nullability of the elements from the nullability of | ||
the array itself. Pay attention to the syntax | ||
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se17/html/jls-9.html#jls-9.7.4[defined by the Java specification] which may be | ||
initially surprising: | ||
|
||
- `@Nullable Object[] array` means individual elements can be null but the array itself can't. | ||
- `Object @Nullable [] array` means individual elements can't be null but the array itself can. | ||
- `@Nullable Object @Nullable [] array` means both individual elements and the array can be null. | ||
|
||
The Java specifications also enforces that annotations defined with `@Target(ElementType.TYPE_USE)` like JSpecify | ||
`@Nullable` should be specified after the last `.` with inner or fully qualified types: | ||
|
||
- `Cache.@Nullable ValueWrapper` | ||
- `jakarta.validation.@Nullable Validator` | ||
|
||
https://jspecify.dev/docs/api/org/jspecify/annotations/NonNull.html[`@NonNull`] and | ||
https://jspecify.dev/docs/api/org/jspecify/annotations/NullUnmarked.html[`@NullUnmarked`] should rarely be needed for | ||
typical use cases. | ||
|
||
The {spring-framework-api}/lang/Contract.html[@Contract] annotation in the `org.springframework.lang` package | ||
can be used to express complementary semantics to avoid non-relevant null-safety warnings in your codebase. | ||
|
||
NOTE: Complementary to nullability annotations, the {spring-framework-api}/lang/CheckReturnValue.html[@CheckReturnValue] | ||
annotation in the `org.springframework.lang` package can be used to specify that the method return value must be used. | ||
|
||
[[null-safety-migrating]] | ||
== Migrating from Spring null-safety annotations | ||
|
||
Spring null-safety annotations {spring-framework-api}/lang/Nullable.html[`@Nullable`], | ||
{spring-framework-api}/lang/NonNull.html[`@NonNull`], | ||
{spring-framework-api}/lang/NonNullApi.html[`@NonNullApi`], and | ||
{spring-framework-api}/lang/NonNullFields.html[`@NonNullFields`] in the `org.springframework.lang` package are | ||
deprecated as of Spring Framework 7 and superseded by JSpecify annotations. | ||
|
||
A key difference is that Spring null-safety annotations, following JSR 305 semantics, apply to fields, | ||
parameters and return values while JSpecify annotations apply to type usages. This subtle difference | ||
is in practice pretty significant, as it allows for example to differentiate the nullability of elements from the | ||
nullability of arrays/varargs as well as defining the nullability of generic types. | ||
|
||
That means array and varargs null-safety declarations have to be updated to keep the same semantic. For example | ||
`@Nullable Object[] array` with Spring annotations needs to be changed to `Object @Nullable [] array` with JSpecify | ||
annotations. Same for varargs. | ||
|
||
It is also recommended to move field and return value annotations closer to the type, for example: | ||
|
||
- For fields, instead of `@Nullable private String field` with Spring annotations, use `private @Nullable String field` | ||
with JSpecify annotations. | ||
- For return values, instead of `@Nullable public String method()` with Spring annotations, use | ||
`public @Nullable String method()` with JSpecify annotations. | ||
|
||
Also, with JSpecify, you don't need to specify `@NonNull` when overriding a type usage annotated with `@Nullable` in the | ||
super method to "undo" the nullable declaration in null-marked code. Just declare it unannotated and the null-marked | ||
defaults (a type usage is considered non-null unless explicitly annotated as nullable) will apply. | ||
|
||
It is neither necessary nor recommended to add a JSR-305 dependency to the project classpath to | ||
take advantage of Spring's null-safe APIs. Only projects such as Spring-based libraries that use | ||
null-safety annotations in their codebase should add `com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305:3.0.2` | ||
with `compileOnly` Gradle configuration or Maven `provided` scope to avoid compiler warnings. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters