auto-fitBounds - WIP

[sebholstein]

This is a WIP Pull request!

This adds a new service named FitBoundsService. For every AgmMap component, a new instance gets created. The service computes the LatLngBounds for all given elements of the map.
The idea is that all core and custom child components of AgmMap inject that service to add or remove itself from the bounds. The should also provide a new Input named fitBounds (is the name a good idea?) to give the user the option to remove the element from the bounds. The default value of these fitBounds inputs should be true.

The LatLngBounds of the FitBoundsService are exposed as an Observable. The AgmMap component subscribes to this observable:

To enable auto-fitBounds, you have to set the fitBounds input to true:

<agm-map [fitBounds]="true">
  <agm-marker [latitude]="33" [longitude]="40"></agm-marker>
  <agm-marker [latitude]="33" [longitude]="40" [fitBounds]="false"></agm-marker>
</agm-map>

// cc @lazarljubenovic @jinder

[GitCop]

There were the following issues with your Pull Request

• Commit: 6ff1d85
• Commits must be in the following format: %{type}(%{scope}): %{description}

Contribution guidelines are available at https://github.com/SebastianM/angular2-google-maps/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

---

This message was auto-generated by https://gitcop.com

[Jdruwe]

@SebastianM any updates on this? Would love this feature :)

[Opticsponge]

this dead?

[jacobuid]

@SebastianM Can we get this!! This would be extremely helpful on your map

[sebholstein]

@Opticsponge no not dead but not finished yet :)

[rbarcelos]

Any update on this?

[hedata]

having this would be amazing or an option so gmaps doesnt update position at all .. making me crazy updating my markers and google maps jumps around like crazy trying to fit bounds

[jakehockey10]

👍

[Anoxy]

@SebastianM any updates on this ?

[craftpip]

+1, This is a must have feature.

[jimmykane]

Any update?

[TobiasVdb]

+1

[alexdaley]

+1 on this

[skie]

+1

[matthiaslexer]

+1

[laureD2SI]

+1

[matiishyn]

any updates on this? Or maybe any alternative solutions?

[naggingant]

👍

[mjrdnk]

What is the status of this merge?
Anyone taking care of it?

[sebholstein]

I'm closing this in favour of #1389