Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: mention SCMP_ARCH_{M68K,SH,SHEB} in seccomp_arch_add(3) #416

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

AkihiroSuda
Copy link
Contributor

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda commented Sep 26, 2023

Fixes: dd5c9c2 ("arch: Add 32-bit Motorola 68000 support")
Fixes: c12945d ("arch: Add SuperH 32-bit support")
Similar to: 76e3689 ("doc: mention SCMP_ARCH_LOONGARCH64 in seccomp_arch_add(3)")

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda changed the title doc: mention SCMP_ARCH_M68K in seccomp_arch_add(3) doc: mention SCMP_ARCH_{M68K,SHEB,SH} in seccomp_arch_add(3) Sep 26, 2023
Fixes: dd5c9c2 ("arch: Add 32-bit Motorola 68000 support")
Fixes: c12945d ("arch: Add SuperH 32-bit support")
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda changed the title doc: mention SCMP_ARCH_{M68K,SHEB,SH} in seccomp_arch_add(3) doc: mention SCMP_ARCH_{M68K,SH,SHEB} in seccomp_arch_add(3) Sep 26, 2023
Copy link
Member

@drakenclimber drakenclimber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Acked-by: Tom Hromatka <tom.hromatka@oracle.com>

@pcmoore pcmoore changed the title doc: mention SCMP_ARCH_{M68K,SH,SHEB} in seccomp_arch_add(3) BUG: mention SCMP_ARCH_{M68K,SH,SHEB} in seccomp_arch_add(3) Nov 30, 2023
@pcmoore pcmoore added the bug label Nov 30, 2023
@pcmoore pcmoore added this to the v2.6.0 milestone Nov 30, 2023
@pcmoore
Copy link
Member

pcmoore commented Nov 30, 2023

Merged via 44f2393, thanks!

@pcmoore pcmoore closed this Nov 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants