[occ] Fix parent store readset validation #348
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
udpatil
changed the title
stevenlanders
approved these changes
Nov 10, 2023
yup good point, will add |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## occ-main #348 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 56.12% 56.12%
=========================================
Files 627 627
Lines 52859 52860 +1
=========================================
+ Hits 29668 29669 +1
Misses 21084 21084
Partials 2107 2107
|
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
## Describe your changes and provide context This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys ## Testing performed to validate your change Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2024
This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2024
This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2024
This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2024
## Describe your changes and provide context This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys ## Testing performed to validate your change Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 25, 2024
## Describe your changes and provide context This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys ## Testing performed to validate your change Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
## Describe your changes and provide context This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys ## Testing performed to validate your change Tested in loadtest cluster
codchen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
## Describe your changes and provide context This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys ## Testing performed to validate your change Tested in loadtest cluster
udpatil
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
## Describe your changes and provide context This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys ## Testing performed to validate your change Tested in loadtest cluster
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes and provide context
This fixes the validation to remove a panic for a case that can actually occur if a transaction writes a key that is later read, and that writing transaction is reverted and then the readset validation reads from parent store. In this case, the readset would have a conflict based on the data available in parent store, so we shouldn't panic. This also adds in the resource types needed for the new DEX_MEM keys
Testing performed to validate your change
Tested in loadtest cluster