standardize workflows for build-resources v4#469
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review AnalysisCode Quality ✅✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ No defects identified
❌ Project memory (CLAUDE.md) consideration
Testing ✅✅ Unit tests not applicable
✅ Integration tests not applicable
✅ Edge cases not applicable
✅ Test coverage not applicable
Documentation ✅✅ README not affected
✅ API docs not applicable
✅ Inline comments
✅ CHANGELOG.md
✅ Markdown formatting
Security ✅✅ No hardcoded credentials
✅ Input validation not applicable
✅ Proper error handling
✅ No sensitive data in logs
❌ CRITICAL: No license files detected
SummaryThis PR successfully standardizes GitHub Actions workflows to use Issues Found:
Recommendations:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
388ad5c to
1711a58
Compare
1711a58 to
eda3713
Compare
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll analyze this PR diff against the provided checklist. This appears to be a workflow standardization update migrating from v3 to v4 of the build-resources workflows. Code ReviewCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide: The changes are primarily to GitHub Actions workflow files and configuration. The YAML formatting follows proper conventions with consistent quoting and structure. ✅ No commented-out code: No commented code found. The removed comment in ✅ Meaningful variable names: All variable and secret names are clear and descriptive (e.g., ✅ DRY principle followed: Changes are systematic and consistent across all workflow files. The migration from v3 to v4 follows the same pattern throughout. ✅ Identify Defects:
✅ Project memory consideration: The changes align with the project's build and development practices. No environment-specific configurations are introduced. TestingDocumentation✅ Readme updated if needed: Not required - workflow changes don't need README updates. ✅ API docs updated: N/A - No API changes. ✅ Inline comments for complex logic: Appropriate for workflow files. The removal of the redundant comment in dependabot.yml is correct. ✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark: The only markdown change is in Security✅ No hardcoded credentials: All credentials properly use GitHub secrets. ✅ Input validation implemented: N/A - Workflow configuration files. ✅ Proper error handling: The workflows properly check job status with ✅ No sensitive data in logs: No sensitive data exposure risk. ✅ No checked-in license files: No .lic files or SummaryIssues Found: 0 Critical, 0 Major, 1 MinorMinor:
Strengths:
Recommendation: ✅ APPROVEThis is a clean infrastructure update with no defects. The changes are well-structured, consistent, and follow GitHub Actions best practices. The only consideration is whether to document this in CHANGELOG.md, which is a minor issue that doesn't block approval.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
.outputs.job-statuswith.resultSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v4kernelsamandcooldownto cspell dictionary