fix docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated workflow

[kernelsam]

Add pull-requests: read permission to docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated.yaml and remove incorrectly named verify-dockerfile-refreshed-at-updated.yaml.

[github-actions]

Super-linter summary

Language	Validation result
CHECKOV	Pass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONS	Pass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONS_ZIZMOR	Pass ✅
GITLEAKS	Pass ✅
GIT_MERGE_CONFLICT_MARKERS	Pass ✅
JSCPD	Pass ✅
PRE_COMMIT	Pass ✅
SPELL_CODESPELL	Pass ✅
TRIVY	Pass ✅
YAML	Pass ✅
YAML_PRETTIER	Pass ✅

All files and directories linted successfully

For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run

Powered by Super-linter

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

PR Code Review

Diff summary: Removes 3 comment lines from .github/workflows/docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated.yaml that described required status check behavior.

---

Code Quality

• ✅ Style guide — Unable to fetch the style guide URL, but the change is a straightforward comment removal in a YAML file with no style concerns.
• ✅ No commented-out code — The removed lines were informational comments, not commented-out code. Their removal is the intent of the change.
• ✅ Meaningful variable names — N/A for this change.
• ✅ DRY principle — N/A.
• ⚠️ Defects / Logic — The removed comments documented important CI behavior: which status check is required vs. optional. Removing this documentation could cause confusion for maintainers configuring branch protection rules. If this information is captured elsewhere (e.g., in a README, wiki, or the branch protection rules themselves), the removal is fine. If not, consider moving the context to a commit message, PR description, or repository documentation rather than deleting it entirely.
• ✅ CLAUDE.md — No concerns; the project memory is general and appropriate.

Testing

• ✅ Unit/integration tests — No logic change; tests not applicable.
• ✅ Edge cases — N/A.
• ✅ Test coverage — N/A.

Documentation

• ✅ README — No update needed.
• ✅ API docs — N/A.
• ⚠️ Inline comments — See defect note above. The deleted comments explained the required vs. non-required status check distinction. If that distinction is still relevant, the documentation loss is a concern.
• ✅ CHANGELOG.md — Not visible in the diff. For a minor comment removal this is typically not required, but if the project mandates CHANGELOG entries for all changes, verify it was updated.
• ✅ Markdown formatting — The YAML file is not a Markdown file; N/A.

Security

• ✅ No hardcoded credentials — None present.
• ✅ Input validation — N/A.
• ✅ Error handling — N/A.
• ✅ Sensitive data in logs — N/A.
• ✅ License files — None present.

---

Summary

This is a minimal, low-risk change. The only concern worth noting:

Documentation loss — The removed comments were the only in-file indicator of which status check name (Verify Dockerfiles REFRESHED_AT Updated / Dockerfile Check Status) must be configured as a required check in GitHub branch protection, and which sibling checks are optional. If this distinction is not documented elsewhere, future maintainers may misconfigure branch protection. Consider noting this in the PR description or a separate doc if it isn't already captured.

No blocking issues. Change is safe to merge with that consideration in mind.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[github-actions]

Coverage report

This PR does not seem to contain any modification to coverable code.