Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

alternative registries are not taken into account #41

Closed
arturoc opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

alternative registries are not taken into account #41

arturoc opened this issue Mar 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@arturoc
Copy link

arturoc commented Mar 12, 2019

Crates from alternative registries are parsed as comming from crates.io so the versions shown are from crates.io instead of the altenarive registry but also if the package doesn't exist in crates.io an error is shown every time the file is modified

To Reproduce

Add a crate from an alternative registry which has a different max version there than in crates.io or doesn't exist in crates.io, only in the alternative registry

Expected behavior
Ideally that versions are parsed from the alternative registry but at least that the alternative registry is detected so those crates don't show any max version and no error is shown if they don't exist in crates.io as happens with packages from git sources

Platform:

  • OS: linux (should happen in other platforms)
  • Version 0.3.7

Additional context
alternative registries are still not stable but will be in the next release, 1.34

@serayuzgur
Copy link
Owner

Hi @arturoc ,
Thanks for the issue.

@0xpr03
Copy link

0xpr03 commented Nov 6, 2019

Yeah currently it'd already be great if one could silence git-based errors.

@serayuzgur serayuzgur modified the milestones: 0.4.4, 0.4.6 Nov 6, 2019
serayuzgur added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2019
- Rate limiting should not trigger error messages [#65](#65)
- Fetch Errors and constant error messages when viewing Cargo.toml with conflicts [#61](#61)
- Alert always happen when I add deps to Cargo.toml [#59](#59)
- `No versions found` error should be less intrusive [#58](#58)
- alternative registries are not taken into account [#41](#41)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants