-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 597
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use nonmax::NonMax* types in Option where possible #2681
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
model
Related to the `model` module.
examples
Related to Serenity's examples.
labels
Jan 2, 2024
Thanks to @TestingPlant on the Rust Community Server for the idea to use nonmax, by the way. |
arqunis
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2024
arqunis
added
enhancement
An improvement to Serenity.
breaking change
The public API is changed, resulting in miscompilations or unexpected new behaviour for users
labels
Jan 2, 2024
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis
pushed a commit
to arqunis/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev
added a commit
to GnomedDev/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
mkrasnitski
pushed a commit
to mkrasnitski/serenity
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2024
…rs#2681) This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally, this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more. I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed. [serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking change
The public API is changed, resulting in miscompilations or unexpected new behaviour for users
enhancement
An improvement to Serenity.
examples
Related to Serenity's examples.
model
Related to the `model` module.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Swaps fields that store
Option<Int>
forOption<NonMaxInt>
where the maximum value would be ludicrous. Sincenonmax
usesNonZero
internally, this gives us niche opts, so model sizes can drop some more. https://www.diffchecker.com/Hr8ZqANM/I've had to include a workaround for LPGhatguy/nonmax#17 in
optional_string
by making my ownTryFrom<u64>
, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.