-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: fokus app #1134
fix: fokus app #1134
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request modify the logic for handling the Changes
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/routes/universal-login/routes.tsx (2)
102-103
: LGTM! Security improvement by using client ID instead of User-Agent.The change from User-Agent header check to client ID check is a good security improvement. Client IDs are more reliable and harder to spoof compared to User-Agent headers.
101-104
: Consider extracting client-specific configurations to a separate layer.The current implementation mixes client-specific logic within the universal login routes. As more client-specific cases are added, this could become harder to maintain.
Consider:
- Creating a configuration layer for client-specific settings
- Moving client-specific logic out of universal components
- Implementing a proper strategy pattern for handling different client requirements
Example approach:
interface ClientConfig { termsAndConditionsUrl: string | null; // other client-specific settings } const getClientConfig = async (clientId: string): Promise<ClientConfig> => { // Fetch from database or configuration service };
// HACK: Temporarily remove the terms of service link for the Fokus app | ||
termsAndConditionsUrl: ctx.req.header("User-Agent")?.startsWith("fokus") | ||
? null | ||
: vendorSettings.termsAndConditionsUrl, | ||
termsAndConditionsUrl: | ||
client.id === "fokus-app" ? null : vendorSettings.termsAndConditionsUrl, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide a final response:
The HACK comment accurately reflects a concerning temporary solution
The evidence shows this is indeed a problematic temporary solution:
- The test fixtures show Fokus has terms and conditions URL (
https://www.fokus.se/prenumerationsvillkor/
) - Other vendors consistently maintain terms and conditions URLs
- No documentation or configuration justifies this exception
- The HACK comment itself acknowledges this as temporary
This requires attention as:
- It's an undocumented deviation from standard vendor behavior
- It bypasses terms and conditions that exist for Fokus (
/prenumerationsvillkor/
) - No alternative mechanism is provided for Fokus app users
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider implementing a proper solution for terms and conditions handling.
The current implementation is marked as a HACK and completely removes terms for the Fokus app. This could lead to legal/compliance issues if terms and conditions are required for all users.
Would you like help designing a more robust solution that:
- Provides app-specific terms and conditions
- Ensures legal compliance
- Maintains a consistent user experience
Let's verify if terms are required for all clients:
Let me gather more context about the Fokus app specifically to understand if this is a temporary solution or if there are any documented reasons for this exception.
Let me check one more thing to see if there are any specific client configurations or requirements for the Fokus app.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for terms and conditions related configurations or requirements
rg -g '!node_modules' -i 'terms.*conditions'
Length of output: 1003
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any mentions of Fokus app and terms/conditions
rg -g '!node_modules' -B 3 -A 3 'fokus.*app'
# Also check for any documentation or comments about this
rg -g '!node_modules' -i 'fokus' README.md docs/ 2>/dev/null
# Look for any configuration related to Fokus
rg -g '!node_modules' '"fokus"' -l | grep -i 'config\|settings'
Length of output: 1575
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for client configuration patterns and Fokus-specific settings
rg -g '!node_modules' -B 5 -A 5 'client\.id.*fokus'
# Look for any client configuration files
fd -g '*client*.{ts,js,json}'
Length of output: 1374
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes