Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fokus app #1134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024
Merged

fix: fokus app #1134

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

markusahlstrand
Copy link

@markusahlstrand markusahlstrand commented Nov 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated handling of the terms and conditions link visibility based on client identifier for improved user experience.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved an issue where the terms and conditions URL was incorrectly set to null for specific user agents.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the logic for handling the termsAndConditionsUrl in the initJSXRoute function within the src/routes/universal-login/routes.tsx file. The previous implementation set the URL to null if the User-Agent header began with "fokus". The updated logic checks if the client.id is "fokus-app" instead, changing how the terms and conditions link is determined based on the client identifier.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/routes/universal-login/routes.tsx Modified initJSXRoute to check client.id for "fokus-app" instead of checking User-Agent.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: add fokus hack #1133: The changes in this PR involve the removal of the termsAndConditionsUrl for the fokus app, which directly relates to the modification in the main PR that alters how the termsAndConditionsUrl is handled based on the client identifier.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/routes/universal-login/routes.tsx (2)

102-103: LGTM! Security improvement by using client ID instead of User-Agent.

The change from User-Agent header check to client ID check is a good security improvement. Client IDs are more reliable and harder to spoof compared to User-Agent headers.


101-104: Consider extracting client-specific configurations to a separate layer.

The current implementation mixes client-specific logic within the universal login routes. As more client-specific cases are added, this could become harder to maintain.

Consider:

  1. Creating a configuration layer for client-specific settings
  2. Moving client-specific logic out of universal components
  3. Implementing a proper strategy pattern for handling different client requirements

Example approach:

interface ClientConfig {
  termsAndConditionsUrl: string | null;
  // other client-specific settings
}

const getClientConfig = async (clientId: string): Promise<ClientConfig> => {
  // Fetch from database or configuration service
};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcbcce7 and 309361b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/routes/universal-login/routes.tsx (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 101 to 104
// HACK: Temporarily remove the terms of service link for the Fokus app
termsAndConditionsUrl: ctx.req.header("User-Agent")?.startsWith("fokus")
? null
: vendorSettings.termsAndConditionsUrl,
termsAndConditionsUrl:
client.id === "fokus-app" ? null : vendorSettings.termsAndConditionsUrl,
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the gathered evidence, I can now provide a final response:

The HACK comment accurately reflects a concerning temporary solution

The evidence shows this is indeed a problematic temporary solution:

  • The test fixtures show Fokus has terms and conditions URL (https://www.fokus.se/prenumerationsvillkor/)
  • Other vendors consistently maintain terms and conditions URLs
  • No documentation or configuration justifies this exception
  • The HACK comment itself acknowledges this as temporary

This requires attention as:

  • It's an undocumented deviation from standard vendor behavior
  • It bypasses terms and conditions that exist for Fokus (/prenumerationsvillkor/)
  • No alternative mechanism is provided for Fokus app users
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider implementing a proper solution for terms and conditions handling.

The current implementation is marked as a HACK and completely removes terms for the Fokus app. This could lead to legal/compliance issues if terms and conditions are required for all users.

Would you like help designing a more robust solution that:

  1. Provides app-specific terms and conditions
  2. Ensures legal compliance
  3. Maintains a consistent user experience

Let's verify if terms are required for all clients:


Let me gather more context about the Fokus app specifically to understand if this is a temporary solution or if there are any documented reasons for this exception.


Let me check one more thing to see if there are any specific client configurations or requirements for the Fokus app.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for terms and conditions related configurations or requirements
rg -g '!node_modules' -i 'terms.*conditions' 

Length of output: 1003


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any mentions of Fokus app and terms/conditions
rg -g '!node_modules' -B 3 -A 3 'fokus.*app'

# Also check for any documentation or comments about this
rg -g '!node_modules' -i 'fokus' README.md docs/ 2>/dev/null

# Look for any configuration related to Fokus
rg -g '!node_modules' '"fokus"' -l | grep -i 'config\|settings'

Length of output: 1575


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for client configuration patterns and Fokus-specific settings
rg -g '!node_modules' -B 5 -A 5 'client\.id.*fokus'

# Look for any client configuration files
fd -g '*client*.{ts,js,json}'

Length of output: 1374

@markusahlstrand markusahlstrand merged commit 97e5842 into main Nov 29, 2024
2 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant