Ma/membercare fixes #1160
Ma/membercare fixes #1160
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a consistent change across multiple OAuth2 authentication strategy files, focusing on modifying the user information return structure. The primary modification involves replacing the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AuthProvider
participant Strategy
participant UserService
Client->>Strategy: Request Authorization
Strategy->>AuthProvider: Get Authorization Code
AuthProvider-->>Strategy: Return Authorization Code
Strategy->>AuthProvider: Validate Code
AuthProvider-->>Strategy: Return ID Token
Strategy->>Strategy: Parse Token
Strategy->>UserService: Return User Info with 'sub'
UserService-->>Client: Authenticate User
Possibly related PRs
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/strategies/apple.ts (1)
All OAuth2 strategies consistently use
subfor user identification, but test fixtures need updatingThe verification shows that all OAuth2 strategies (Apple, Google, Facebook, Membercare) have been properly updated to use
subinstead ofid. However, there's one remaining instance ofidusage in test fixtures that should be updated for consistency:
test/fixtures/oauth2Client.ts: The mock response still usesidinstead ofsub🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
94-101: LGTM! The change standardizes user identification across OAuth2 providers.The replacement of
idwithsubaligns with OAuth2/OIDC standards and maintains consistency with other authentication strategies.Let's verify the consistency of this change across other OAuth2 strategies:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all OAuth2 strategies use 'sub' instead of 'id' # Search for OAuth2-related files and check their return structures echo "Checking OAuth2 strategy implementations..." fd -e ts -e js --full-path "src/strategies" --exec rg -A 5 -B 5 "validateAuthorizationCodeAndGetUser|return \{|sub:|id:" # Specifically check for any remaining uses of 'id:' in return objects echo "Checking for any remaining 'id:' usage in return objects..." ast-grep --pattern 'return { id: $_, $$$ }'Length of output: 4551
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/strategies/membercare.ts (1)
220-220: Sanitize 'DebtorAccountNumber' When Constructing URLsWhen constructing
userInfoUrl.pathnameusingaccessToken.payload["Membercare.Security.DebtorAccountNumber"], ensure that the value is sanitized to prevent injection attacks or malformed URLs. Even if the value comes from a trusted source, it's good practice to validate and encode dynamic URL segments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/strategies/apple.ts(1 hunks)src/strategies/facebook.ts(1 hunks)src/strategies/google-oauth2.ts(1 hunks)src/strategies/index.ts(1 hunks)src/strategies/membercare.ts(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/strategies/membercare.ts (1)
188-190: Validate Access to 'Membercare.Security.DebtorAccountNumber'
Ensure that the property Membercare.Security.DebtorAccountNumber reliably exists in accessToken.payload. Accessing properties with dots in their keys can be error-prone if the payload structure changes or if the property is missing. Consider adding a check to confirm this property is present and properly formatted.
src/strategies/index.ts (1)
10-10: Verify All References to 'UserInfo.id' Are Updated to 'sub'
The UserInfo type now uses sub instead of id. Ensure that all references to UserInfo.id in the codebase are updated to UserInfo.sub to prevent runtime errors or undefined property access.
Run the following script to identify any remaining references to UserInfo.id:
✅ Verification successful
No References to UserInfo.id Found - Change is Safe
The codebase scan shows that there are no occurrences of UserInfo.id. The only references to UserInfo are its type definition and usage as a return type, where it's correctly defined with sub as the identifier property. This confirms that no updates are needed elsewhere in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all occurrences of 'UserInfo.id'
rg --type=typescript 'UserInfo\.id' -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for UserInfo.id pattern in all files, focusing on common extensions for TypeScript/JavaScript
rg 'UserInfo\.id' -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -A 3 -B 3
# Also search for any usage of UserInfo type to understand the context
rg 'UserInfo' -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -A 3 -B 3
# Use ast-grep to find type definitions and interfaces related to UserInfo
ast-grep --pattern 'interface UserInfo {
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'type UserInfo = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1186
src/strategies/facebook.ts (1)
65-65: Ensure Consumers Expect 'sub' Instead of 'id'
The return value now uses sub instead of id. Confirm that all parts of the codebase consuming this function are updated to expect sub, avoiding potential issues with undefined properties.
Run the following script to find usages of id in relation to the Facebook strategy:
✅ Verification successful
No Issues Found - Consumers Already Expect 'sub' Property
The codebase analysis shows that the consumers are already using the sub property, not id. Specifically, in src/authentication-flows/oauth2.tsx, the code destructures sub from the userinfo object: const { sub, email, ...profileData } = userinfo. This indicates that the codebase is already aligned with the Facebook strategy's return value using sub.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find code that accesses 'id' from the Facebook strategy's return value
rg --type=typescript 'facebook\.validateAuthorizationCodeAndGetUser.*\.id' -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing 'facebook' and 'validateAuthorizationCodeAndGetUser'
rg -l "validateAuthorizationCodeAndGetUser.*facebook"
# Search for usage of the function and surrounding context
rg "validateAuthorizationCodeAndGetUser" -A 5 -B 5
# Look for any destructuring or usage of 'id' or 'sub' properties
ast-grep --pattern 'const { $$$, id, $$$} = $_'
ast-grep --pattern 'const { $$$, sub, $$$} = $_'
Length of output: 3836
src/strategies/google-oauth2.ts (1)
69-69: Update Codebase to Use 'sub' Instead of 'id' for User Identification
The return object now includes sub instead of id. Ensure that all functions and components that use this user information are updated accordingly to prevent inconsistencies and errors.
Run the following script to locate any references to id from the Google OAuth2 strategy:
| @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ export async function getRedirect( | |||
| const authorizationUrl = oauth2.createAuthorizationURL( | |||
| options.authorization_endpoint, | |||
| code, | |||
| ["openid"], | |||
| ["openid profile usermc"], | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Additional OAuth2 Scopes Are Necessary
The OAuth2 scopes have been expanded from ["openid"] to ["openid profile usermc"]. Verify that requesting the profile and usermc scopes is required for the application's functionality. Unnecessary scopes may lead to excessive permissions and potential privacy concerns.
| sub: debtor.debtorAccountNumber, | ||
| email: debtor.contacts[0].value, | ||
| given_name: debtor.firstname, | ||
| family_name: debtor.lastname, | ||
| name: debtor.name, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Safely Access 'contacts' When Retrieving Email
In the return statement, you're accessing debtor.contacts[0].value to get the email. Ensure that debtor.contacts is not empty to prevent errors. Consider providing a fallback or handling the case where no contacts are available.
Apply this diff to safely extract the email:
return {
sub: debtor.debtorAccountNumber,
- email: debtor.contacts[0].value,
+ email: debtor.contacts.length > 0 ? debtor.contacts[0].value : undefined,
given_name: debtor.firstname,
family_name: debtor.lastname,
name: debtor.name,
};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| sub: debtor.debtorAccountNumber, | |
| email: debtor.contacts[0].value, | |
| given_name: debtor.firstname, | |
| family_name: debtor.lastname, | |
| name: debtor.name, | |
| sub: debtor.debtorAccountNumber, | |
| email: debtor.contacts.length > 0 ? debtor.contacts[0].value : undefined, | |
| given_name: debtor.firstname, | |
| family_name: debtor.lastname, | |
| name: debtor.name, |
| name: z.string().optional(), | ||
| debtorAccountNumber: z.string(), | ||
| contacts: z.array( | ||
| z.object({ | ||
| value: z.string(), | ||
| }), | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle Empty 'contacts' Array to Prevent Runtime Errors
When parsing debtor.contacts, ensure that the array is not empty before accessing its elements. Attempting to access debtor.contacts[0] without checking can result in a runtime error if the array is empty.
Apply this diff to add validation:
const debtor = z
.object({
firstname: z.string().optional(),
lastname: z.string().optional(),
name: z.string().optional(),
debtorAccountNumber: z.string(),
contacts: z.array(
z.object({
value: z.string(),
}),
),
})
.parse(debtorBody);
+ if (debtor.contacts.length === 0) {
+ throw new Error("No contacts available for debtor");
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation