-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LFO #338
LFO #338
Conversation
b928712
to
012aadb
Compare
I added some tests, trying to automate them also on travis. It may fail, bear with me :) |
On reference data points, may we possibly flac them up to reduce their size? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So if you're certain about the phase I guess we need to amend sfzformat.com, and if my solution for the reference sampling point is OK, I'm good with the rest 🙂
Last commit introduces a terrible hack for Garritan instrument compatibility.
|
This seems like a reasonable solution to a messy problem! |
|
I have done some changes as follows to help make the work more mergeable
On the tests, I wish to have them preferably included in the regular test suite, I will add some work towards this direction. |
The reference files have been visually validated Tweaks for the LFO regression test
Regression tests are moved into the main test suite. Good for merge. |
I like the plotting one but it can go somewhere else. I'm not used to whipping out gnuplots on the fly :) We still need something like it to validate changes visually and possibly update the reference. |
This adds SFZv2 LFO on top of the mod matrix PR.
There are the basic targets for now (amplitude, pitch, etc)
Simple usage example