Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licensing #5

Closed
ghoneycutt opened this issue Oct 14, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Licensing #5

ghoneycutt opened this issue Oct 14, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@ghoneycutt
Copy link
Collaborator

@edestecd @sgnl05 I'm interested in your code but can't use it because there are no licensing terms. Could you add a license? Suggest GPLv3 or Apache v2.

@edestecd
Copy link
Collaborator

I prefer GPL-3.0+, but I'll let @sgnl05 ultimately decide, since he started the module...

@ghoneycutt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm not positive, but I think you both need to specify your licensing since you both contributed work.

@edestecd
Copy link
Collaborator

Probably, but if we agree, we can just pick one for the module.

@sgnl05
Copy link
Owner

sgnl05 commented Oct 15, 2015

metadata.json already states that the license is Apache-2.0 (which Puppet suggests as default), but I've forgotten to include the LICENCE file. However I don't really have any preferences when it comes to apache or GPL, so if you @edestecd have strong feelings for GPL, then we'll go for that. :)

sgnl05 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2015
@sgnl05
Copy link
Owner

sgnl05 commented Oct 16, 2015

Changed licence to GPL-3.0+ in metadata.json and added a LICENCE file. This should cover it for both of us, right @edestecd ?

@edestecd
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good to me.

@sgnl05 sgnl05 closed this as completed Oct 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants