added old rails manifest.json support

[alexeuler]

This change is

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 82.449% when pulling 42f310b on alleycat-at-git:hotfix/assets_symlinks into 4f05cf4 on shakacode:master.

[justin808]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

lib/tasks/assets.rake, line 34 [r1] (raw file):

          next
        end
        manifest_path = manifest_glob.first

@alleycat-at-git If somebody upgraded, is it possible they could have both files? Seems that the code would get the first file, being the new format.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[justin808]

I'd day ready to release.

Previously, coveralls wrote…

Coverage remained the same at 82.449% when pulling 42f310b on alleycat-at-git:hotfix/assets_symlinks into 4f05cf4 on shakacode:master.

---

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[alexeuler]

Theoretically it could be, but the code will take the new format file and it will be right in this case

On 27 May 2016, at 10:05, Justin Gordon notifications@github.com wrote:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

lib/tasks/assets.rake, line 34 [r1](raw file):

      next
    end
    manifest_path = manifest_glob.first

@alleycat-at-git If somebody upgraded, is it possible they could have both files? Seems that the code would get the first file, being the new format.

Comments from Reviewable

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[justin808]

@alleycat-at-git I'll take care of the CHANGELOG.md

Previously, alleycat-at-git (Alexey) wrote…

Theoretically it could be, but the code will take the new format file and it will be right in this case

---

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[justin808]

Fixed #435.