Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade actions/setup-node to v4 #497

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024
Merged

upgrade actions/setup-node to v4 #497

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 6, 2024

Conversation

adriangohjw
Copy link
Contributor

@adriangohjw adriangohjw commented Jul 2, 2024

Summary

Node.js 16 actions are deprecated and we want to update them to use the latest actions

  • Updated actions/setup-node@v3 to actions/setup-node@v4

Pull Request checklist

- [ ] Add/update test to cover these changes
- [ ] Update documentation

  • Update CHANGELOG file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated GitHub Actions to use actions/setup-node@v4 for improved Node.js compatibility and support.
  • Documentation

    • Updated CHANGELOG.md to reflect the changes in GitHub Actions, ensuring they use Node.js 20.0 for better compatibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates primarily focus on enhancing compatibility and performance by upgrading GitHub Actions workflows to use the latest Node.js versions. Specifically, the actions/setup-node action has been updated from version 3 to version 4 across various CI workflows to address compatibility issues and ensure up-to-date Node.js environment utilization.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/dummy.yml, .github/workflows/node.yml Upgraded actions/setup-node action from v3 to v4 to ensure compatibility and leverage the latest Node.js version.
CHANGELOG.md Documented the updates to GitHub Actions to use Node.js 20.0 versions, highlighting the contributions and purpose behind the changes.

Poem

In workflows old, we did reside,
With Node.js, we took a stride.
From v3 to v4, we now upgrade,
With latest tools, the path we laid.
GitHub Actions now refined and bright,
Our CI dances in the light. ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@adriangohjw adriangohjw marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2024 09:26
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f53f060 and 146496c.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/dummy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/node.yml (1 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/dummy.yml
  • .github/workflows/node.yml
Additional context used
Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md

13-13: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time

(MD001, heading-increment)


14-14: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)


18-18: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)


10-10: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


10-10: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


13-13: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)


14-14: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD032, blanks-around-lists)

Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

15-15: LGTM!

The blank line is correctly placed.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@ _next_ branch is for v8 changes
## [Unreleased]
Changes since the last non-beta release.

#### Changed
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct the heading level.

The heading level should be incremented by one level at a time. Change the h4 heading to h3.

- #### Changed
+ ### Changed
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
#### Changed
### Changed
Tools
Markdownlint

13-13: Expected: h3; Actual: h4
Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time

(MD001, heading-increment)


13-13: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD022, blanks-around-headings)

@justin808
Copy link
Member

@adriangohjw can you check on the failing tests?

@adriangohjw
Copy link
Contributor Author

@justin808 the failing specs seem to be an existing issue that happened in the previous commit too . Have opened a new issue for that #498

* fix: manually insert shakapacker using "echo" instead
* manually overwrite "rack" to be v2
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 146496c and d6ed693.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md

14-14: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)


18-18: Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
Unordered list style

(MD004, ul-style)

Additional comments not posted (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

13-13: LGTM!

The heading level increment is correct.

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@justin808 justin808 merged commit b60efcc into shakacode:main Jul 6, 2024
39 checks passed
@justin808
Copy link
Member

@adriangohjw latest merge to master is failing. Can you please fix?

@adriangohjw
Copy link
Contributor Author

@justin808 i suspect this is a github runners issue (i face this in my work CI sometimes too) - possible to re-run the CI?

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants