Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Grayson Gall <66559200+gsgall@users.noreply.github.com>

doc/content/source/bcs/CircuitDirichletPotential.md

@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ V_\text{source} + V_\text{cathode} = e \Gamma A R
 \end{equation}
 
 Where $V_\text{source}$ is driven the potential, $V_\text{cathode}$ is the potential at cathode,
-$\Gamma$ is the charged flux to the boundary, $e$ is the elemental charge, $A$ is the cross-sectional area of the plasma, and
-$R$ is the ballast resistance. When converting the density to log form and applying a scaling factor for both the mesh and voltage,
+$\Gamma$ is the charged particle flux at the boundary, $e$ is the elemental charge, $A$ is the cross-sectional area of the plasma, and
+$R$ is the ballast resistance. When converting the density to log-molar form and applying a scaling factor for both the mesh and voltage,
 `CircuitDirichletPotential` is defined as
 
 \begin{equation}
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ V_\text{source} + V_\text{cathode} = e N_{A} \Gamma \frac{A}{l_{c}^2} \frac{R}{V
 Where $N_{A}$ is Avogadro's number, $l_{c}$ is the scaling factor of the mesh, and $V_{c}$ is the scaling factor of the potential.
 
 
-The charged flux is supplied as a [Postprocessor](syntax/Postprocessors/index.md) (usually the [`SideCurrent`](/postprocessors/SideCurrent.md) Postprocessor).
+The charged particle flux is supplied as a [Postprocessor](syntax/Postprocessors/index.md) (usually the [`SideCurrent`](/postprocessors/SideCurrent.md) Postprocessor).
 
 !alert warning title=Untested Class
 The CircuitDirichletPotential does not have a formalized test, yet. For this reason,
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ please refer to the [MOOSE Contributing page](framework/contributing.md).
     potential_units = V
     resist = 100 #in Ohms
     surface = anode
-    surfuce_potential = 100 #in V
+    surface_potential = 100 #in V
     boundary = 'electrode'
   []
 []