Productpro3 #59
Productpro3 #59
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces extensive modifications to feature permissions for different user roles, particularly focusing on enhancing vendor capabilities while limiting certain admin functionalities. Key changes include adjustments to permissions across various pages such as products, orders, and payments, with new methods added to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (6)
184-186: Enhanced pricing capabilities with bulk discount optionsThe addition of bulk discount features empowers vendors to create more sophisticated pricing strategies, potentially increasing sales and customer satisfaction. This is a valuable tool for vendors to manage promotions and incentivize larger purchases.
Consider adding a feature to allow vendors to schedule bulk discounts for specific time periods, enhancing their ability to run time-limited promotions.
187-189: New geolocation features for individual productsThe addition of geolocation features for individual products can greatly enhance the shopping experience by allowing customers to find locally relevant items. However, there are two important considerations:
Privacy: Ensure that the use of geolocation data complies with relevant privacy regulations and that customers are informed about how this data is used.
Vendor Usability: Managing geolocation on an individual product basis might be time-consuming for vendors with large inventories.
Consider implementing the following enhancements:
- Add clear privacy notices and consent mechanisms for geolocation data usage.
- Develop a bulk geolocation management feature to improve efficiency for vendors with many products.
- Implement geolocation inheritance from store settings to reduce manual work for vendors.
Line range hint
590-591: New seller badge management features for adminsThe addition of seller badge management features empowers admins to recognize and incentivize high-performing vendors. This can lead to improved marketplace quality and vendor motivation.
Consider implementing the following enhancements to the seller badge system:
- Add automated badge assignment based on predefined criteria (e.g., sales volume, customer ratings).
- Implement a notification system to inform vendors when they earn new badges.
- Create a public page showcasing top badge holders to incentivize vendor performance.
Line range hint
679-680: New product cloning features for vendorsThe addition of product cloning capabilities can greatly enhance vendor efficiency, especially when listing multiple similar products. This feature can save time and reduce errors in product creation.
To further improve this feature, consider implementing the following:
- Ensure that unique identifiers (SKUs, etc.) are automatically generated or prompted for change during the cloning process.
- Add an option for vendors to choose which product attributes to clone and which to input manually.
- Implement a "cloned from" metadata field to help vendors track the origin of cloned products.
Line range hint
914-914: New wholesale product creation capability for vendorsThe addition of wholesale product creation for vendors is a significant enhancement that can expand the marketplace's reach to business customers. This feature can potentially increase transaction volumes and attract a new segment of buyers.
When implementing this feature, consider the following aspects:
- Ensure clear separation and visibility controls between wholesale and retail prices.
- Implement minimum order quantities or values for wholesale purchases.
- Develop a robust user role system to properly identify and verify wholesale customers.
- Create guidelines for vendors on setting wholesale prices to maintain marketplace integrity.
Line range hint
922-936: Comprehensive WooCommerce Booking Integration featuresThe addition of booking capabilities is a major enhancement to the marketplace, allowing for the sale of services and time-dependent products. This feature set covers all necessary aspects for admins, vendors, and customers to effectively manage and use a booking system.
When implementing the booking system, consider the following crucial aspects:
- Develop a robust conflict resolution system to prevent double-bookings.
- Implement flexible cancellation and refund policies that can be customized by vendors.
- Create a notification system for booking reminders, changes, and cancellations.
- Ensure the booking calendar has adequate performance optimizations to handle a large number of bookings and availability checks.
- Implement a review system specific to bookable products/services.
- Consider adding features for recurring bookings and group bookings to enhance system capabilities.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (2)
366-366: Address the TODO comment for refactoring testsThe
// todo: refactor below testscomment indicates that the following tests need refactoring. Maintaining clean and organized test code enhances readability and maintainability.Would you like assistance in refactoring these tests, or should we create a GitHub issue to track this task?
388-388: Implement the missing test for adding an already added attributeThe
// todo: vendor cant add already added attributecomment suggests a missing test case. Adding this test will increase the robustness of the test suite by ensuring that duplicate attributes cannot be added.Would you like assistance in writing this test, or should we open a GitHub issue to track this enhancement?
tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (2)
1318-1322: Remove Redundant Visibility Check Before SavingIn the
removeProductAttributemethod, the checkawait this.notToBeVisible(productsVendor.attribute.savedAttribute(attribute));is performed both before and after saving the product. The first check before saving might be redundant since the attribute might still be visible until the changes are saved. Consider removing the first check to streamline the method.
1350-1351: Update Method Comment to Reflect FunctionalityThe comment above
removeProductBulkDiscountOptionsincorrectly states "// add product discount options". It should be updated to accurately reflect that the method removes bulk discount options.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/pages/productsPage.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (8)
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
180-183: Expanded vendor capabilities for product attributes managementThese new features significantly enhance the vendor's ability to manage product attributes, allowing for more detailed and flexible product listings. This improvement can lead to better product categorization and search functionality, ultimately benefiting both vendors and customers.
tests/pw/tests/e2e/productsDetails.spec.ts (7)
362-364: Well-implemented test for adding product attributesThe test effectively verifies that a vendor can add a product attribute, enhancing the test coverage for product attribute functionality.
392-394: Good addition of test for adding bulk discount optionsThe test correctly verifies that a vendor can add bulk discount options to a product, enhancing coverage for discount functionality.
396-398: Effective test for updating bulk discount optionsThis test ensures that vendors can update existing bulk discount options, which is essential for maintaining accurate product pricing.
400-402: Well-implemented test for removing bulk discount optionsThe test validates that a vendor can remove bulk discount options from a product, ensuring the functionality works as expected.
406-408: Addition of test for adding product geolocationThe test effectively verifies that a vendor can add geolocation data to a product, which is important for location-specific functionalities.
410-412: Test for updating product geolocation is appropriateThis test confirms that a vendor can update the geolocation information of a product, ensuring that location updates are handled correctly.
414-416: Correctly implemented test for removing product geolocationThe test ensures that a vendor can remove geolocation data from a product, which is vital for maintaining accurate product information.
| test('vendor can create product attribute term', { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => { | ||
| const [, , , attributeName] = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(payloads.createAttribute(), payloads.createAttributeTerm(), payloads.adminAuth); | ||
| const [, , productName] = await apiUtils.createProduct(payloads.createProduct(), payloads.vendorAuth); | ||
| await vendor.addProductAttribute(productName, { ...data.product.productInfo.attribute, attributeName: attributeName }, true); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve destructuring assignments for better readability
The destructuring assignments in lines 368 and 369 use multiple commas to skip elements, which can reduce code clarity. Consider returning objects from the createAttributeTerm and createProduct functions or using named variables in the destructuring to enhance readability.
For example, you could modify the destructuring as follows:
const { attributeName } = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(...);
const { productName } = await apiUtils.createProduct(...);This approach improves code clarity and makes it easier to understand which variables are being used.
| test('vendor can remove product attribute', { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => { | ||
| const [, attributeId, , attributeName, attributeTerm] = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(payloads.createAttribute(), payloads.createAttributeTerm(), payloads.adminAuth); | ||
| const attributes = { id: attributeId, name: attributeName, options: [attributeTerm] }; | ||
| const [, , productName] = await apiUtils.createProduct({ ...payloads.createProduct(), attributes: [attributes] }, payloads.vendorAuth); | ||
| await vendor.removeProductAttribute(productName, attributeName); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to eliminate code duplication in test setup
The setup code in this test is similar to previous tests involving the creation of attributes and products. Extracting common setup logic into helper functions can reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Consider creating helper functions like createAttributeWithTerm and createProductWithAttributes to encapsulate the repeated code.
| test('vendor can remove product attribute term', { tag: ['@pro', '@vendor'] }, async () => { | ||
| const [, attributeId, , attributeName, attributeTerm] = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(payloads.createAttribute(), payloads.createAttributeTerm(), payloads.adminAuth); | ||
| const [, , , , attributeTerm2] = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(payloads.createAttribute(), payloads.createAttributeTerm(), payloads.adminAuth); | ||
| const attributes = { id: attributeId, name: attributeName, options: [attributeTerm, attributeTerm2] }; | ||
| const [, , productName] = await apiUtils.createProduct({ ...payloads.createProduct(), attributes: [attributes] }, payloads.vendorAuth); | ||
| await vendor.removeProductAttributeTerm(productName, attributeName, attributeTerm2); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance variable naming and reduce repetition
The repeated use of destructuring with unnamed variables can affect code comprehension. Using meaningful variable names and refactoring repeated code can enhance readability.
Modify the destructuring to use named variables:
const { attributeId, attributeName, attributeTerm } = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(...);
const { attributeTerm: attributeTerm2 } = await apiUtils.createAttributeTerm(...);This approach makes it clear which variables are being assigned and their purpose.
| // add product attribute | ||
| async addProductAttribute(productName: string, attribute: product['productInfo']['attribute'], addTerm: boolean = false): Promise<void> { | ||
| await this.goToProductEdit(productName); | ||
| await this.selectByLabel(productsVendor.attribute.customAttribute, attribute.attributeName); | ||
| await this.clickAndWaitForResponse(data.subUrls.ajax, productsVendor.attribute.addAttribute); | ||
| await this.check(productsVendor.attribute.visibleOnTheProductPage); | ||
| await this.click(productsVendor.attribute.selectAll); | ||
| await this.notToHaveCount(productsVendor.attribute.attributeTerms, 0); | ||
| if (addTerm) { | ||
| await this.click(productsVendor.attribute.addNew); | ||
| await this.clearAndType(productsVendor.attribute.attributeTermInput, attribute.attributeTerm); | ||
| await this.clickAndWaitForResponse(data.subUrls.ajax, productsVendor.attribute.confirmAddAttributeTerm); | ||
| await this.toBeVisible(productsVendor.attribute.selectedAttributeTerm(attribute.attributeTerm)); | ||
| } | ||
| await this.clickAndWaitForResponse(data.subUrls.ajax, productsVendor.attribute.saveAttribute); | ||
| await this.saveProduct(); | ||
| await this.toBeVisible(productsVendor.attribute.savedAttribute(attribute.attributeName)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure Proper Error Handling When Adding Product Attributes
In the addProductAttribute method, consider adding error handling to handle cases where the attribute selection fails or the attribute term addition fails. This will enhance user feedback and improve robustness.
| await this.clearAndType(productsVendor.bulkDiscount.lotMinimumQuantity, quantityDiscount.minimumQuantity); | ||
| await this.clearAndType(productsVendor.bulkDiscount.lotDiscountInPercentage, quantityDiscount.discountPercentage); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add Validation for Discount Percentage Input
In the addProductBulkDiscountOptions method, consider adding validation to ensure that quantityDiscount.discountPercentage is within an acceptable range (e.g., 0 to 100). This will prevent invalid discount values and enhance data integrity.
| await this.uncheck(productsVendor.geolocation.sameAsStore); | ||
| await this.typeAndWaitForResponse(data.subUrls.gmap, productsVendor.geolocation.productLocation, location); | ||
| await this.press(data.key.arrowDown); | ||
| await this.press(data.key.enter); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Error Handling for Geolocation Input
In the addProductGeolocation method, consider adding error handling to manage situations where the geolocation API fails or returns invalid results. This will improve the robustness of the method and provide better user feedback.
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests