Update readme

README.md

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 # scoop-search
 
-[![](https://goreportcard.com/badge/github.com/shilangyu/scoop-search)](https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/shilangyu/scoop-search)
 [![](https://github.com/shilangyu/scoop-search/workflows/ci/badge.svg)](https://github.com/shilangyu/scoop-search/actions)
 
 Fast `scoop search` drop-in replacement 🚀
@@ -49,23 +48,39 @@ Behaves just like `scoop search` and returns identical output. If any difference
 
 **Non-goal**: any additional features unavailable in scoop search
 
+## Building
+
+This project uses Zig. Building and running works on all platforms, not only Windows.
+
+Build with (output is stored in `./zig-out/bin`):
+
+```sh
+zig build -Doptimize=ReleaseFast
+```
+
+Run debug with:
+
+```sh
+zig build run -- searchterm
+```
+
 ## Benchmarks
 
-Done with [hyperfine](https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine). `scoop-search` is on average 50 times faster.
+Done with [hyperfine](https://github.com/sharkdp/hyperfine). `scoop-search` is on average 350 times faster.
 
 ```sh
 ❯ hyperfine --warmup 1 'scoop-search google' 'scoop search google'
-Benchmark #1: scoop-search google
- Time (mean ± σ): 76.1 ms ± 1.9 ms [User: 0.8 ms, System: 5.8 ms]
- Range (min … max): 73.4 ms … 82.7 ms 37 runs
+Benchmark 1: scoop-search google
+ Time (mean ± σ): 60.3 ms ± 3.5 ms [User: 91.2 ms, System: 394.2 ms]
+ Range (min … max): 55.1 ms … 73.8 ms 49 runs
 
-Benchmark #2: scoop search google
- Time (mean ± σ):  3.910 s ± 0.015 s [User: 1.4 ms, System: 7.9 ms]
- Range (min … max):  3.888 s …  3.928 s 10 runs
+Benchmark 2: scoop search google
+ Time (mean ± σ): 21.275 s ± 2.657 s [User: 9.604 s, System: 11.789 s]
+ Range (min … max): 19.143 s … 27.035 s 10 runs
 
 Summary
- 'scoop-search google' ran
-  51.37 ± 1.31 times faster than 'scoop search google'
+ scoop-search google ran
+ 352.74 ± 48.49 times faster than scoop search google
 ```
 
 _ran on AMD Ryzen 5 3600 @ 3.6GHz_