Reintroduce the Makefiles. #54
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Khoi Nguyen <nguyenan@iwacc.org>
|
Dear @memepaleontologist2002 ! Thanks for the PR, but I am much happier with the cmake and perl5-based buildsys. They are not too much to require and reintroing the makefiles will violate DRY. So I have to say "no": http://shlomifishswiki.branchable.com/Never_Try_to_Please_Everyone/ . I'll give you a chance to argue your stance, though. |
|
At least that's why forks exist! |
|
A C++ programmer on scratch.mit.edu wanted to keep his Makefiles, I don't really blame him. |
Signed-off-by: Khoi Nguyen <nguyenan@iwacc.org>
|
I rest my case. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I reintroduced the old Makefiles due to convenience purposes. People don't have to install CMake to compile it.