fix: fix memory leak #91
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve a refactoring of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant readZipFile
participant localFun
participant FileReader
Caller->>readZipFile: Call readZipFile()
readZipFile->>localFun: Call localFun()
localFun->>FileReader: Open file from zip
FileReader-->>localFun: Return file handle
localFun->>FileReader: Read data
FileReader-->>localFun: Return data
localFun->>FileReader: Close file
localFun-->>readZipFile: Return data
readZipFile-->>Caller: Return data
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apk/apk.go (1)
183-199: Minor style improvements suggestedConsider cleaning up the spacing and indentation:
- localFun := func() error { - rc, e := file.Open() - if e != nil { - return e - } - defer rc.Close() - if _, e = io.Copy(buf, rc); e != nil { - return e - } - return nil - } - + localFun := func() error { + rc, e := file.Open() + if e != nil { + return e + } + defer rc.Close() + if _, e = io.Copy(buf, rc); e != nil { + return e + } + return nil + } if err = localFun(); err != nil { return } -
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apk/apk.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apk/apk.go (2)
184-193: Effective fix for the memory leak!
The introduction of localFun with a properly scoped defer ensures that file handles are closed immediately after use, effectively preventing resource leaks. The error handling is also well-implemented.
184-193: Verify similar patterns in the codebase
Let's check if there are other locations in the codebase that might benefit from the same memory leak fix pattern.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information. The searches show that there's only one instance of file.Open() in the codebase (the one being reviewed), and only two instances of defer Close() patterns - one in the code being reviewed and another in a test file which follows a standard test cleanup pattern.
No similar patterns requiring fixes found
The current implementation is the only instance in the codebase where file.Open() is used with a deferred close. The other deferred close found is in a test file following a standard test cleanup pattern, which is appropriate for its context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other potential locations using zip.File.Open() that might need similar fixes
echo "Searching for other uses of zip.File.Open()..."
rg "\.Open\(\)" --type go -C 3
# Search for deferred closes that might benefit from smaller scopes
echo "Searching for defer close patterns..."
rg "defer.*\.Close\(\)" --type go -C 3
Length of output: 861
Summary by CodeRabbit
github.com/shogo82148/androidbinarytogithub.com/HelloYmf/androidbinaryin thego.modfile.