Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade dependencies #464

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 18, 2022
Merged

Upgrade dependencies #464

merged 10 commits into from
Mar 18, 2022

Conversation

framini
Copy link
Contributor

@framini framini commented Mar 17, 2022

Upgraded everything but esbuild related dependencies (including Vite). There seems to be an issue with our codebase and esbuild@0.14.9+ where it fails to parse some generic functions. I'll dig into in another PR since that error lock us to esbuild@0.14.8

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 17, 2022

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 9a318e5

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 12 packages
Name Type
@sw-internal/e2e-realtime-api Patch
@sw-internal/playground-js Patch
@sw-internal/playground-realtime-api Patch
@signalwire/core Patch
@signalwire/realtime-api Patch
@sw-internal/build Patch
@sw-internal/common Patch
@sw-internal/release Patch
@signalwire/js Patch
@signalwire/react-native Patch
@signalwire/web-api Patch
@signalwire/webrtc Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@framini framini requested a review from edolix March 17, 2022 13:56
@edolix edolix merged commit 2c8fc59 into main Mar 18, 2022
@edolix edolix deleted the fr/housekeeping branch March 18, 2022 14:26
@danieleds
Copy link
Contributor

@framini @edolix not sure why, but it seems that these changes broke typedoc for all packages

@edolix
Copy link
Contributor

edolix commented Mar 18, 2022

broke typedoc

@danieleds you mean the generated MD docs with the other plugin?

@danieleds
Copy link
Contributor

@edolix yes. I've fixed it in #465 though, so it should be enough to merge that one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants