-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 745
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changing the log file permissions (at least under Windows) #3732
Comments
Definitely something we can fix, just needs somebody willing to dig into Windows permissions and do it. Last time I attempted it with #2394 I got overwhelmed by the complexity of Windows file perms and gave up. |
To add more context to this, this is actually the behaviour of Sloggers, the logging library responsible for the logfile. I think any changes should be made there, see here. I actually was the one that implemented the strict permissions in the library. The way it works is that it mirrors the behaviour on Linux (set the logfile to a umask of I'm by no means an expert in Windows file permissions so if this is improper behaviour for Windows specifically we should change it in Sloggers such that it also inherits the permissions of the folder. Alternatively we could implement a flag like |
Let's say that it is unexpected. And even Linux has support for ACL.
I do feel that there are different ways to setup a server and its services and its users, and your proposal lets the user choose how they want to handle everything. |
## Issue Addressed #3732 ## Proposed Changes Add a CLI flag to allow users to opt out of the restrictive permissions of the log files. ## Additional Info This is not recommended for most users. The log files can contain sensitive information such as validator indices, public keys and API tokens (see #2438). However some users using a multi-user setup may find this helpful if they understand the risks involved.
## Issue Addressed #3732 ## Proposed Changes Add a CLI flag to allow users to opt out of the restrictive permissions of the log files. ## Additional Info This is not recommended for most users. The log files can contain sensitive information such as validator indices, public keys and API tokens (see #2438). However some users using a multi-user setup may find this helpful if they understand the risks involved.
Closed by #3747 |
## Issue Addressed sigp#3732 ## Proposed Changes Add a CLI flag to allow users to opt out of the restrictive permissions of the log files. ## Additional Info This is not recommended for most users. The log files can contain sensitive information such as validator indices, public keys and API tokens (see sigp#2438). However some users using a multi-user setup may find this helpful if they understand the risks involved.
Squashed commit of the following: commit ad08d07 Author: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com> Date: Mon Dec 5 16:51:06 2022 +1100 Remove crits for late block commit 8e85d62 Author: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com> Date: Mon Dec 5 16:48:43 2022 +1100 Downgrade log for payload reveal failure commit 84392d6 Author: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io> Date: Fri Dec 2 00:07:43 2022 +0000 Delete DB schema migrations for v11 and earlier (sigp#3761) ## Proposed Changes Now that the Gnosis merge is scheduled, all users should have upgraded beyond Lighthouse v3.0.0. Accordingly we can delete schema migrations for versions prior to v3.0.0. ## Additional Info I also deleted the state cache stuff I added in sigp#3714 as it turned out to be useless for the light client proofs due to the one-slot offset. commit 18c9be5 Author: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me> Date: Thu Dec 1 06:03:53 2022 +0000 Add API endpoint to count statuses of all validators (sigp#3756) ## Issue Addressed sigp#3724 ## Proposed Changes Adds an endpoint to quickly count the number of occurances of each status in the validator set. ## Usage ```bash curl -X GET "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/ui/validator_count" -H "accept: application/json" | jq ``` ```json { "data": { "active_ongoing":479508, "active_exiting":0, "active_slashed":0, "pending_initialized":28, "pending_queued":0, "withdrawal_possible":933, "withdrawal_done":0, "exited_unslashed":0, "exited_slashed":3 } } ``` commit 2211504 Author: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io> Date: Wed Nov 30 05:22:58 2022 +0000 Prioritise important parts of block processing (sigp#3696) ## Issue Addressed Closes sigp#2327 ## Proposed Changes This is an extension of some ideas I implemented while working on `tree-states`: - Cache the indexed attestations from blocks in the `ConsensusContext`. Previously we were re-computing them 3-4 times over. - Clean up `import_block` by splitting each part into `import_block_XXX`. - Move some stuff off hot paths, specifically: - Relocate non-essential tasks that were running between receiving the payload verification status and priming the early attester cache. These tasks are moved after the cache priming: - Attestation observation - Validator monitor updates - Slasher updates - Updating the shuffling cache - Fork choice attestation observation now happens at the end of block verification in parallel with payload verification (this seems to save 5-10ms). - Payload verification now happens _before_ advancing the pre-state and writing it to disk! States were previously being written eagerly and adding ~20-30ms in front of verifying the execution payload. State catchup also sometimes takes ~500ms if we get a cache miss and need to rebuild the tree hash cache. The remaining task that's taking substantial time (~20ms) is importing the block to fork choice. I _think_ this is because of pull-tips, and we should be able to optimise it out with a clever total active balance cache in the state (which would be computed in parallel with payload verification). I've decided to leave that for future work though. For now it can be observed via the new `beacon_block_processing_post_exec_pre_attestable_seconds` metric. Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> commit b4f4c0d Author: Divma <divma@protonmail.com> Date: Wed Nov 30 03:21:35 2022 +0000 Ipv6 bootnodes (sigp#3752) ## Issue Addressed our bootnodes as of now support only ipv4. this makes it so that they support ipv6 ## Proposed Changes - Adds code necessary to update the bootnodes to run on dual stack nodes and therefore contact and store ipv6 nodes. - Adds some metrics about connectivity type of stored peers. It might have been nice to see some metrics over the sessions but that feels out of scope right now. ## Additional Info - some code quality improvements sneaked in since the changes seemed small - I think it depends on the OS, but enabling mapped addresses on an ipv6 node without dual stack support enabled could fail silently, making these nodes effectively ipv6 only. In the future I'll probably change this to use two sockets, which should fail loudly commit 3534c85 Author: GeemoCandama <geemo@tutanota.com> Date: Tue Nov 29 08:19:27 2022 +0000 Optimize finalized chain sync by skipping newPayload messages (sigp#3738) ## Issue Addressed sigp#3704 ## Proposed Changes Adds is_syncing_finalized: bool parameter for block verification functions. Sets the payload_verification_status to Optimistic if is_syncing_finalized is true. Uses SyncState in NetworkGlobals in BeaconProcessor to retrieve the syncing status. ## Additional Info I could implement FinalizedSignatureVerifiedBlock if you think it would be nicer. commit a2969ba Author: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com> Date: Tue Nov 29 05:51:42 2022 +0000 Improve debugging experience for builder proposals (sigp#3725) ## Issue Addressed NA ## Proposed Changes This PR sets out to improve the logging/metrics experience when interacting with the builder. Namely, it: - Adds/changes metrics (see "Metrics Changes" section). - Adds new logs which show the duration of requests to the builder/local EL. - Refactors existing logs for consistency and so that the `parent_hash` is include in all relevant logs (we can grep for this field when trying to trace the flow of block production). Additionally, when I was implementing this PR I noticed that we skip some verification of the builder payload in the scenario where the builder return `Ok` but the local EL returns with `Err`. Namely, we were skipping the bid signature and other values like parent hash and prev randao. In this PR I've changed it so we *always* check these values and reject the bid if they're incorrect. With these changes, we'll sometimes choose to skip a proposal rather than propose something invalid -- that's the only side-effect to the changes that I can see. ## Metrics Changes - Changed: `execution_layer_request_times`: - `method = "get_blinded_payload_local"`: time taken to get a payload from a local EE. - `method = "get_blinded_payload_builder"`: time taken to get a blinded payload from a builder. - `method = "post_blinded_payload_builder"`: time taken to get a builder to reveal a payload they've previously supplied us. - `execution_layer_get_payload_outcome` - `outcome = "success"`: we successfully produced a payload from a builder or local EE. - `outcome = "failure"`: we were unable to get a payload from a builder or local EE. - New: `execution_layer_builder_reveal_payload_outcome` - `outcome = "success"`: a builder revealed a payload from a signed, blinded block. - `outcome = "failure"`: the builder did not reveal the payload. - New: `execution_layer_get_payload_source` - `type = "builder"`: we used a payload from a builder to produce a block. - `type = "local"`: we used a payload from a local EE to produce a block. - New: `execution_layer_get_payload_builder_rejections` has a `reason` field to describe why we rejected a payload from a builder. - New: `execution_layer_payload_bids` tracks the bid (in gwei) from the builder or local EE (local EE not yet supported, waiting on EEs to expose the value). Can only record values that fit inside an i64 (roughly 9 million ETH). ## Additional Info NA commit 99ec9d9 Author: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com> Date: Mon Nov 28 10:05:43 2022 +0000 Add Run a Node guide (sigp#3681) ## Issue Addressed Related to sigp#3672 ## Proposed Changes - Added a guide to run a node. Mainly, copy and paste from 'Merge Migration' and 'Checkpoint Sync'. - Ranked it high in ToC: - Introduction - Installation - Run a Node - Become a Validator ... - Hid 'Merge Migration' in ToC. ## Additional Info - Should I add/rephrase/delete something? - Now there is some redundancy: - 'Run a node' and 'Checkpoint Sync' contain similar information. - Same for 'Run a node' and 'Become a Validator'. Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <114221396+kevinbogner@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com> commit 2779017 Author: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com> Date: Mon Nov 28 07:36:52 2022 +0000 Gossipsub fast message id change (sigp#3755) For improved consistency, this mixes in the topic into our fast message id for more consistent tracking of messages across topics. commit c881b80 Author: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me> Date: Mon Nov 28 00:22:53 2022 +0000 Add CLI flag for gui requirements (sigp#3731) ## Issue Addressed sigp#3723 ## Proposed Changes Adds a new CLI flag `--gui` which enables all the various flags required for the gui to function properly. Currently enables the `--http` and `--validator-monitor-auto` flags. commit 969ff24 Author: Mac L <mjladson@pm.me> Date: Fri Nov 25 07:57:11 2022 +0000 Add CLI flag to opt in to world-readable log files (sigp#3747) ## Issue Addressed sigp#3732 ## Proposed Changes Add a CLI flag to allow users to opt out of the restrictive permissions of the log files. ## Additional Info This is not recommended for most users. The log files can contain sensitive information such as validator indices, public keys and API tokens (see sigp#2438). However some users using a multi-user setup may find this helpful if they understand the risks involved. commit e9bf7f7 Author: antondlr <anton@delaruelle.net> Date: Fri Nov 25 07:57:10 2022 +0000 remove commas from comma-separated kv pairs (sigp#3737) ## Issue Addressed Logs are in comma separated kv list, but the values sometimes contain commas, which breaks parsing commit d5a2de7 Author: Giulio rebuffo <giulio.rebuffo@gmail.com> Date: Fri Nov 25 05:19:00 2022 +0000 Added LightClientBootstrap V1 (sigp#3711) ## Issue Addressed Partially addresses sigp#3651 ## Proposed Changes Adds server-side support for light_client_bootstrap_v1 topic ## Additional Info This PR, creates each time a bootstrap without using cache, I do not know how necessary a cache is in this case as this topic is not supposed to be called frequently and IMHO we can just prevent abuse by using the limiter, but let me know what you think or if there is any caveat to this, or if it is necessary only for the sake of good practice. Co-authored-by: Pawan Dhananjay <pawandhananjay@gmail.com>
## Issue Addressed sigp#3732 ## Proposed Changes Add a CLI flag to allow users to opt out of the restrictive permissions of the log files. ## Additional Info This is not recommended for most users. The log files can contain sensitive information such as validator indices, public keys and API tokens (see sigp#2438). However some users using a multi-user setup may find this helpful if they understand the risks involved.
The log file is created with the
.restrict_permissions(true)
lighthouse/lighthouse/environment/src/lib.rs
Line 223 in 28aceaa
This under Windows sets the file pemissions to OWNER_RIGHTS and nothing else (while normally under Windows files should inherit the permissions of the folder they are contained in), and it is quite a pain if you have the Lighthouse that is running under a user and you use another user to check the logs.
Would it be possible to remove this restriction and/or to remove it under Windows?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: