Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Altair] Remove duplicate vars, panic on u64::pow overflow #2350

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 24, 2021
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use core::result::Result::Ok;
use safe_arith::SafeArith;
use types::beacon_state::BeaconState;
use types::chain_spec::ChainSpec;
use types::consts::altair::{INACTIVITY_SCORE_BIAS, TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX};
use types::consts::altair::TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX;
use types::eth_spec::EthSpec;

// FIXME(altair): there's no EF test for this one (yet)
Expand All @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ pub fn process_inactivity_updates<T: EthSpec>(
} else if state.is_in_inactivity_leak(spec) {
state
.get_inactivity_score_mut(index)?
.safe_add_assign(INACTIVITY_SCORE_BIAS)?;
.safe_add_assign(spec.inactivity_score_bias)?;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

}
}
Ok(())
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
use safe_arith::SafeArith;
use types::consts::altair::{
FLAG_INDICES_AND_WEIGHTS, INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT_ALTAIR, INACTIVITY_SCORE_BIAS,
TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX, WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR,
FLAG_INDICES_AND_WEIGHTS, TIMELY_TARGET_FLAG_INDEX, WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR,
};
use types::{BeaconState, ChainSpec, EthSpec};

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -147,8 +146,9 @@ fn get_inactivity_penalty_deltas<T: EthSpec>(
.get_validator(index)?
.effective_balance
.safe_mul(state.get_inactivity_score(index)?)?;
let penalty_denominator =
INACTIVITY_SCORE_BIAS.safe_mul(INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT_ALTAIR)?;
let penalty_denominator = spec
.inactivity_score_bias
.safe_mul(spec.inactivity_penalty_quotient_altair)?;
delta.penalize(penalty_numerator.safe_div(penalty_denominator)?)?;
}
deltas
Expand Down
40 changes: 32 additions & 8 deletions consensus/types/src/chain_spec.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -304,10 +304,22 @@ impl ChainSpec {
/*
* Gwei values
*/
min_deposit_amount: u64::pow(2, 0).saturating_mul(u64::pow(10, 9)),
max_effective_balance: u64::pow(2, 5).saturating_mul(u64::pow(10, 9)),
ejection_balance: u64::pow(2, 4).saturating_mul(u64::pow(10, 9)),
effective_balance_increment: u64::pow(2, 0).saturating_mul(u64::pow(10, 9)),
min_deposit_amount: option_wrapper(|| {
u64::checked_pow(2, 0)?.checked_mul(u64::checked_pow(10, 9)?)
})
.expect("calculation does not overflow"),
max_effective_balance: option_wrapper(|| {
u64::checked_pow(2, 5)?.checked_mul(u64::checked_pow(10, 9)?)
})
.expect("calculation does not overflow"),
ejection_balance: option_wrapper(|| {
u64::checked_pow(2, 4)?.checked_mul(u64::checked_pow(10, 9)?)
})
.expect("calculation does not overflow"),
effective_balance_increment: option_wrapper(|| {
u64::checked_pow(2, 0)?.checked_mul(u64::checked_pow(10, 9)?)
})
.expect("calculation does not overflow"),

/*
* Initial Values
Expand All @@ -333,7 +345,7 @@ impl ChainSpec {
base_reward_factor: 64,
whistleblower_reward_quotient: 512,
proposer_reward_quotient: 8,
inactivity_penalty_quotient: u64::pow(2, 26),
inactivity_penalty_quotient: u64::checked_pow(2, 26).expect("pow does not overflow"),
min_slashing_penalty_quotient: 128,
proportional_slashing_multiplier: 1,

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -367,8 +379,12 @@ impl ChainSpec {
/*
* Altair hard fork params
*/
inactivity_penalty_quotient_altair: u64::pow(2, 24).saturating_mul(3),
min_slashing_penalty_quotient_altair: u64::pow(2, 6),
inactivity_penalty_quotient_altair: option_wrapper(|| {
u64::checked_pow(2, 24)?.checked_mul(3)
})
.expect("calculation does not overflow"),
min_slashing_penalty_quotient_altair: u64::checked_pow(2, 6)
.expect("pow does not overflow"),
proportional_slashing_multiplier_altair: 2,
inactivity_score_bias: 4,
epochs_per_sync_committee_period: Epoch::new(256),
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -408,7 +424,7 @@ impl ChainSpec {
shard_committee_period: 64,
genesis_delay: 300,
seconds_per_slot: 6,
inactivity_penalty_quotient: u64::pow(2, 25),
inactivity_penalty_quotient: u64::checked_pow(2, 25).expect("pow does not overflow"),
min_slashing_penalty_quotient: 64,
proportional_slashing_multiplier: 2,
safe_slots_to_update_justified: 2,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -930,6 +946,14 @@ impl AltairConfig {
}
}

/// A simple wrapper to permit the in-line use of `?`.
fn option_wrapper<F, T>(f: F) -> Option<T>
where
F: Fn() -> Option<T>,
{
f()
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
Expand Down
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions consensus/types/src/consts.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ pub mod altair {
pub const SYNC_REWARD_WEIGHT: u64 = 8;
pub const PROPOSER_WEIGHT: u64 = 8;
pub const WEIGHT_DENOMINATOR: u64 = 64;
pub const INACTIVITY_SCORE_BIAS: u64 = 4;
pub const INACTIVITY_PENALTY_QUOTIENT_ALTAIR: u64 = u64::pow(2, 24).saturating_mul(3);

pub const FLAG_INDICES_AND_WEIGHTS: [(u32, u64); NUM_FLAG_INDICES] = [
(TIMELY_HEAD_FLAG_INDEX, TIMELY_HEAD_WEIGHT),
Expand Down