Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.0: Documentation updates for COSIGN_EXPERIMENTAL and new flags #2534

Closed
haydentherapper opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2741
Closed

2.0: Documentation updates for COSIGN_EXPERIMENTAL and new flags #2534

haydentherapper opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #2741
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor

Description

We need to remove references to COSIGN_EXPERIMENTAL in code (tests and CLI docs), documentation, and blog posts. We also need to update documentation with any new required flags (like identity flags) and optional flags (like tlog-upload).

@haydentherapper haydentherapper added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 12, 2022
@haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor Author

Flag documentation also includes [EXPERIMENTAL] in many places, that needs to be removed.

@znewman01
Copy link
Contributor

Timing is a little awkward here. There's a few changes we should have staged up and ready to go simultaneous with the release (anything breaking). Before the 2.0 release we can't push most of these.

Leaving COSIGN_EXPERIMENTAL in for a while doesn't actually hurt anything, and I worry switching too soon will cause confusion before folks have updated.

@haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor Author

All examples in the code should reflect the current state imo, so we should at least remove the references to experimental in the code base.

We also need to go add the newly required identity flags, since all existing example commands won’t work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants