-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Number of PASSed variant calls: 0 #49
Comments
Hi,
And this error was not sufficiently taken care of during processing (the program continued to run, but without any variants). Quick solution: remove the FILTER line the header section of your VCF, or try adding a Description(?) I need to work on a more robust solution to handle this, making sure that either that the vcf-validator and vcfanno have similar requirements for the query VCF thanks, |
@brentp, |
I see the cause in vcfgo. will test a fix today. |
thanks. |
Just made a quick fix. @apastore I can verify that it will now parse your bam. If you care to replace your existing vcfanno binary with the one attached, you can proceed past this error. I'll make a new release of vcfanno this week. |
Great! Thanks a lot for the rapid response and fix. Will install the new version later this week. |
new release: https://github.com/brentp/vcfanno/releases/tag/v0.3.1 |
Hi Sigven, I have a set of Vcf file where pcgr complaints that no variant has a Filter == PASS.
do you have any idea what is going on? I have tried in both tumor-only and paired mode, as well the stable and the devel versions.
Thanks a lot!
python ~/pcgr/pcgr.py --input_vcf pcgc_fail_PASS.vcf.gz ~/pcgr/ pcgc_fail_PASS grch37 ./pcgr.toml pcgc_fail_PASS
[pcgc_fail_PASS.vcf.gz](https://github.com/sigven/pcgr/files/2503951/pcgc_fail_PASS.vcf.gz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: